Suppr超能文献

依达拉奉口服混悬液每日一次给药与已批准的间歇性给药方案治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者长达48周的疗效和安全性(研究MT - 1186 - A02)

Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Dosing vs. Approved On/Off Dosing of Edaravone Oral Suspension Up to 48 Weeks in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Study MT-1186-A02).

作者信息

Rothstein Jeffrey, Genge Angela, De Silva Shari, Zinman Lorne, Chum Marvin, Chio Adriano, Sobue Gen, Aoki Masashi, Yoshino Hiide, Doyu Manabu, Selness Daniel, Todorovic Vesna, Sasson Nissim, Hirai Manabu, Takahashi Fumihiro, Salah Alejandro, Wamil Art, Apple Stephen

机构信息

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2025 Sep;72(3):433-442. doi: 10.1002/mus.28448. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: An On/Off dosing regimen of intravenous (IV) edaravone and edaravone oral suspension is approved in the US for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Placebo-controlled clinical trials showed IV edaravone slows the rate of physical functional decline. This study evaluated whether investigational daily dosing displayed superior efficacy vs. approved on/off dosing of edaravone oral suspension, and assessed safety and tolerability, over 48 weeks in patients with ALS.

METHODS

Study MT-1186-A02 (NCT04569084) was a multicenter, phase 3b, double-blind, parallel group, superiority study that randomized patients to edaravone oral suspension (105-mg dose) administered Once Daily or the same edaravone oral suspension dose administered according to the approved On/Off regimen including placebo to mimic daily drug dosing. Patients had definite or probable ALS, baseline forced vital capacity ≥ 70%, and baseline disease duration ≤ 2 years. The primary endpoint was a combined assessment of function and survival (CAFS) at week 48, which included change in ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and time to death.

RESULTS

CAFS at week 48 indicated Once Daily dosing did not show a statistically significant difference vs. approved on/off dosing (p = 0.777). Both dosing regimens provided comparable change from baseline ALSFRS-R total score to week 48 (least squares mean difference: 0.27 [95% CI -1.43 to 1.97]). Edaravone oral suspension was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified in either group.

DISCUSSION

Daily edaravone oral suspension did not show superiority and had equivalent safety and tolerability vs. the approved On/Off regimen, reinforcing the appropriateness of the approved dosing regimen.

摘要

引言/目的:在美国,静脉注射依达拉奉和依达拉奉口服混悬液的间歇给药方案被批准用于治疗肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)。安慰剂对照临床试验表明,静脉注射依达拉奉可减缓身体功能衰退的速度。本研究评估了在48周内,与依达拉奉口服混悬液的批准间歇给药相比,研究性每日给药是否显示出更高的疗效,并评估了安全性和耐受性。

方法

研究MT - 1186 - A02(NCT04569084)是一项多中心、3b期、双盲、平行组、优效性研究,将患者随机分为每日一次服用依达拉奉口服混悬液(105毫克剂量)或按照批准的间歇给药方案服用相同剂量的依达拉奉口服混悬液,包括使用安慰剂模拟每日给药。患者患有明确或可能的ALS,基线用力肺活量≥70%,基线病程≤2年。主要终点是第48周时的功能和生存综合评估(CAFS),包括ALS功能评分量表修订版(ALSFRS - R)的变化和死亡时间。

结果

第48周时的CAFS表明,每日给药与批准的间歇给药相比没有统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.777)。两种给药方案从基线ALSFRS - R总分到第48周的变化相当(最小二乘均值差异:0.27 [95%置信区间 -1.43至1.97])。依达拉奉口服混悬液耐受性良好,两组均未发现新的安全问题。

讨论

每日服用依达拉奉口服混悬液与批准的间歇给药方案相比没有显示出优越性,且安全性和耐受性相当,这进一步证明了批准给药方案的合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adec/12338024/42bf23835c67/MUS-72-433-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验