• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

少年司法的十字路口:初次被捕 5 年后初始处理决定对青少年的影响。

Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Dev Psychopathol. 2021 May;33(2):700-713. doi: 10.1017/S095457942000200X.

DOI:10.1017/S095457942000200X
PMID:33955345
Abstract

The current study advances past research by studying the impact of juvenile justice decision making with a geographically and ethnically diverse sample (N = 1,216) of adolescent boys (ages 13-17 years) for the 5 years following their first arrest. Importantly, all youth in the study were arrested for an eligible offense of moderate severity (e.g., assault, theft) to evaluate whether the initial decision to formally (i.e., sentenced before a judge) or informally (i.e., diverted to community service) process the youth led to differences in outcomes. The current study also advanced past research by using a statistical approach that controlled for a host of potential preexisting vulnerabilities that could influence both the processing decision and the youth's outcomes. Our findings indicated that youth who were formally processed during adolescence were more likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be incarcerated, engaged in more violence, reported a greater affiliation with delinquent peers, reported lower school enrollment, were less likely to graduate high school within 5 years, reported less ability to suppress aggression, and had lower perceptions of opportunities than informally processed youth. Importantly, these findings were not moderated by the age of the youth at his first arrest or his race and ethnicity. These results have important implications for juvenile justice policy by indicating that formally processing youth not only is costly, but it can reduce public safety and reduce the adolescent's later potential contributions to society.

摘要

本研究通过对具有地理和种族多样性的青少年男孩(年龄 13-17 岁)的少年司法决策影响进行研究,推进了过去的研究(N=1216)。在他们首次被捕后的 5 年内,对所有参与研究的青少年进行了评估,这些青少年因中度严重的犯罪(例如殴打、盗窃)被捕,以评估最初的正式处理(即由法官判决)或非正式处理(即转介到社区服务)决策是否会导致结果的差异。本研究还通过使用一种统计方法来控制可能影响处理决策和青少年结果的许多潜在预先存在的脆弱性,从而推进了过去的研究。我们的研究结果表明,在青少年时期被正式处理的青少年更有可能再次被捕,更有可能被监禁,参与更多的暴力行为,与犯罪同伴的联系更紧密,报告的入学率更低,更不可能在 5 年内高中毕业,报告的抑制攻击性的能力更低,对机会的看法也更低,而不是非正式处理的青少年。重要的是,这些发现不受青少年第一次被捕时的年龄或种族和族裔的影响。这些结果对少年司法政策具有重要意义,表明正式处理青少年不仅代价高昂,而且会降低公共安全并降低青少年日后对社会的潜在贡献。

相似文献

1
Crossroads in juvenile justice: The impact of initial processing decision on youth 5 years after first arrest.少年司法的十字路口:初次被捕 5 年后初始处理决定对青少年的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2021 May;33(2):700-713. doi: 10.1017/S095457942000200X.
2
Do callous-unemotional traits moderate the effects of the juvenile justice system on later offending behavior?冷酷无情特质是否会缓和少年司法系统对后期犯罪行为的影响?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;62(2):212-222. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13266. Epub 2020 May 25.
3
Under the radar or under arrest: How is adolescent boys' first contact with the juvenile justice system related to future offending and arrests?在雷达之下或被捕:青少年男孩与少年司法系统的首次接触如何与未来的犯罪和被捕相关?
Law Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;43(4):342-357. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000340.
4
The impact of emotional disturbances on the arrest trajectories of youth as they transition into young adulthood.情绪障碍对青少年向成年早期过渡时被捕轨迹的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Aug;42(8):1286-98. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9974-9. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
5
"It Changed My Life": Traumatic Loss, Behavioral Health, and Turning Points Among Gang-Involved and Justice-Involved Youth.《改变人生的经历》:有帮派和司法涉案经历的青年的创伤性丧失、行为健康和转折点
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8027-8049. doi: 10.1177/0886260519847779. Epub 2019 May 13.
6
Family and parenting interventions in children and adolescents with conduct disorder and delinquency aged 10-17.针对10至17岁品行障碍和犯罪青少年的家庭及养育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(2):CD003015. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003015.
7
Can probation officers identify remorse among male adolescent offenders?缓刑监督官能否识别男性青少年罪犯的悔意?
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):754-761. doi: 10.1037/pas0000391. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
Peer, substance use, and race-related factors associated with recidivism among first-time justice-involved youth.同伴、物质使用和与种族相关的因素与初次涉法青少年再犯率的关系。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Apr;46(2):140-153. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000471. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
9
The company you keep: The neglected role of affiliating with delinquent friends in the development of the cannabis-violence link.你所交往的人:忽视与不良朋友交往在大麻与暴力关联发展中的作用。
Addict Behav. 2024 Apr;151:107939. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107939. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
10
Preventing school-based arrest and recidivism through prearrest diversion: Outcomes of the Philadelphia police school diversion program.通过逮捕前分流预防校内逮捕及再犯:费城警察学校分流项目的成果
Law Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;45(2):165-178. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000440.

引用本文的文献

1
School Entry Skills and Young Adult Outcomes.入学技能与青年成人期的结果
Early Child Res Q. 2025;72:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
2
Trajectories of offending over 9 years after youths' first arrest: What predicts who desists and who continues to offend?青少年首次被捕后 9 年的犯罪轨迹:是什么预测了谁会停止犯罪,谁会继续犯罪?
J Res Adolesc. 2024 Dec;34(4):1312-1325. doi: 10.1111/jora.12926. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Health Service Utilization in Adolescents Following a First Arrest: The Role of Antisocial Behavior, Callous-Unemotional Traits, and Juvenile Justice System Processing.
青少年首次被捕后的卫生服务利用:反社会行为、冷酷无情特征和少年司法系统处理的作用。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 May;51(3):393-405. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01341-x. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
4
Adolescent Contact, Lasting Impact? Lessons Learned From Two Longitudinal Studies Spanning 20 Years of Developmental Science Research With Justice-System-Involved Youths.青少年接触,持久影响?从两项历时 20 年、涉及司法系统青少年的发展科学研究的纵向研究中吸取的经验教训。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2023 Dec;24(3):133-161. doi: 10.1177/15291006231205173.
5
A Within-Individual Examination of the Predictors of Gun Carrying During Adolescence and Young Adulthood Among Young Men.个体内视角下的青少年和青年男性携带枪支的预测因素研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Oct;50(10):1952-1969. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01464-6. Epub 2021 Jul 16.