From the Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital (S.C.W.)St. Petersburg, FL; Federal University of Santa Catarina (G.R.d.O.F.), Florianópolis, Brazil; Medical University of South Carolina (C.M.F., A.T.R.), Charleston, SC; Stanford University Medical Center (M.K.M., R.J.R., B.M.), Palo Alto, CA; and Vanderbilt University Medical Center (M.D.M.), Nashville, TN.
Simul Healthc. 2021 Feb 1;16(1):20-28. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000467.
The pediatric perioperative setting is a dynamic clinical environment where multidisciplinary interprofessional teams interact to deliver complex care to patients. This environment requires clinical teams to possess high levels of complex technical and nontechnical skills. For perioperative teams to identify and maintain clinical competency, well-developed and easy-to-use measures of competency are needed.
Tools for measuring the technical and nontechnical performance of perioperative teams were developed and/or identified, and a group of raters were trained to use the instruments. The trained raters used the tools to assess pediatric teams managing simulated emergencies. A psychometric analysis of the trained raters' scores using the different instruments was performed and the agreement between the trained raters' scores and a reference score was determined.
Five raters were trained and scored 96 recordings of perioperative teams managing simulated emergencies. Scores from both technical skills assessment tools demonstrated significant reliability within and between ratings with the scenario-specific performance checklist tool demonstrating greater interrater agreement than scores from the global rating scale. Scores from both technical skills assessment tools correlated well with the other and with the reference standard scores. Scores from the Team Emergency Assessment Measure nontechnical assessment tool were more reliable within and between raters and correlated better with the reference standard than scores from the BARS tool.
The clinicians trained in this study were able to use the technical performance assessment tools with reliable results that correlated well with reference scores. There was more variability between the raters' scores and less correlation with the reference standard when the raters used the nontechnical assessment tools. The global rating scale used in this study was able to measure the performance of teams across a variety of scenarios and may be generalizable for assessing teams in other clinical scenarios. The Team Emergency Assessment Measure tool demonstrated reliable measures when used to assess interprofessional perioperative teams in this study.
儿科围手术期环境是一个充满活力的临床环境,多学科专业团队在此互动,为患者提供复杂的护理。这种环境要求临床团队具备高水平的复杂技术和非技术技能。为了使围手术期团队能够识别和保持临床能力,需要开发和/或确定易于使用的能力衡量标准。
开发和/或确定了用于衡量围手术期团队技术和非技术绩效的工具,并对一组评估者进行了培训以使用这些工具。经过培训的评估者使用这些工具评估管理模拟紧急情况的儿科团队。使用不同工具对经过培训的评估者的分数进行心理测量分析,并确定经过培训的评估者的分数与参考分数之间的一致性。
培训了 5 名评估者,并对管理模拟紧急情况的围手术期团队的 96 次记录进行了评分。来自两种技术技能评估工具的分数在评分内和评分之间均具有显著可靠性,与特定于场景的绩效检查表工具相比,全球评分量表的评分具有更大的评分者间一致性。两种技术技能评估工具的分数都与其他分数和参考标准分数高度相关。来自团队紧急评估措施非技术评估工具的分数在评分内和评分之间更可靠,并且与参考标准的相关性优于 BARS 工具的分数。
在这项研究中接受培训的临床医生能够使用可靠的技术绩效评估工具,这些工具与参考分数高度相关。当评估者使用非技术评估工具时,评分者之间的差异更大,与参考标准的相关性也更低。在这项研究中使用的全球评分量表能够衡量各种场景下团队的绩效,并且可能适用于评估其他临床场景下的团队。在这项研究中,团队紧急评估措施工具在评估跨专业围手术期团队时表现出可靠的测量结果。