• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水文收缩模式和干燥期持续时间塑造了微生物介导的凋落物分解。

Hydrological contraction patterns and duration of drying period shape microbial-mediated litter decomposition.

机构信息

Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Calçada Martim de Freitas, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal.

Department of Biology, Mt. Allison University, Sackville E4L1G7, New Brunswick, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147312. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147312. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147312
PMID:33957592
Abstract

The length and number of streams experiencing intermittency is expected to increase in response to human population growth, associated water use, and climate change. In these streams, habitat contraction may occur at distinct rates giving rise to drying periods of distinct duration. To date, the impact of drought installation rate and duration have been mostly overlooked. In this microcosm study, stream conditioned oak leaf litter was subjected to either a short (5 weeks) or a long (8 weeks) drying period, originating from a very slow, slow, or abrupt contraction. The effects of these treatments were compared at the end of the drying period in terms of microbial-mediated litter mass loss, fungal biomass, respiration, and sporulation rates. A very slow contraction pattern led to 1.3 times higher mass loss than both slow or abrupt contraction. Fungal biomass, respiration and sporulation rates were up to 2.3 times lower under slow than abrupt contraction. Both drying period durations inhibited leaf decomposition, suggesting an early, critical effect of drying on microbial-mediated processing, regardless of contraction pattern. This seems to be related to an impoverishment of leaf associated fungal communities and resultant lower functional efficacy - species richness decreased by up to 75% in response to a long (vs. short) drying period, despite the maintenance of mycelial biomass. Our results show the relevance of aquatic hyphomycetes to litter decomposition in dry streambeds, particularly following slower habitat contraction patterns. Faster wet-to-dry transitions and longer drying periods strongly impaired microbial functioning, with potential impacts on global processing rates and cascading effects through changes of detritus quality. If confirmed in field tests, such impacts on stream functioning may be mitigated by preserving riparian forests, which may protect against extreme drying events by buffering temperature changes.

摘要

预计随着人口增长、相关用水和气候变化,间歇性水流的长度和数量将会增加。在这些溪流中,栖息地的收缩可能以不同的速度发生,导致持续时间不同的干燥期。迄今为止,干旱安装率和持续时间的影响大多被忽视。在这个微观研究中,溪流条件下的橡树叶凋落物经历了短(5 周)或长(8 周)的干燥期,分别来自非常缓慢、缓慢或突然的收缩。在干燥期结束时,比较了这些处理的效果,包括微生物介导的凋落物质量损失、真菌生物量、呼吸和孢子形成率。非常缓慢的收缩模式导致质量损失比缓慢或突然收缩高 1.3 倍。与突然收缩相比,缓慢收缩下的真菌生物量、呼吸和孢子形成率低 2.3 倍。两种干燥期持续时间都抑制了叶片分解,这表明干燥对微生物介导的处理有早期的关键影响,而与收缩模式无关。这似乎与与叶片相关的真菌群落的贫化以及由此导致的功能效率降低有关——与短(长)干燥期相比,尽管维持了菌丝体生物量,物种丰富度下降了高达 75%。我们的结果表明水生真菌在干河床凋落物分解中的相关性,特别是在较缓慢的栖息地收缩模式下。更快的干湿交替和更长的干燥期强烈损害了微生物的功能,这可能对全球处理速率产生影响,并通过碎屑质量的变化产生级联效应。如果在野外测试中得到证实,通过保护河岸森林,可能会减轻对溪流功能的这种影响,河岸森林可以通过缓冲温度变化来防止极端干燥事件。

相似文献

1
Hydrological contraction patterns and duration of drying period shape microbial-mediated litter decomposition.水文收缩模式和干燥期持续时间塑造了微生物介导的凋落物分解。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147312. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147312. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Air temperature more than drought duration affects litter decomposition under flow intermittency.空气温度比干旱持续时间更能影响间歇流条件下凋落物的分解。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 10;829:154666. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154666. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Leaf litter microbial decomposition in salinized streams under intermittency.间歇性盐化溪流中凋落物微生物分解作用
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 25;653:1204-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.050. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
4
Microbial decomposition is highly sensitive to leaf litter emersion in a permanent temperate stream.微生物分解对永久性温带溪流中叶凋落物的暴露高度敏感。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 15;621:486-496. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.055. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Effects of Eucalyptus plantations on detritus, decomposers, and detritivores in streams.桉树林对溪流中碎屑、分解者和碎屑食性动物的影响。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 Apr 30;2:1173-85. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2002.193.
6
Litter Quality Is a Stronger Driver than Temperature of Early Microbial Decomposition in Oligotrophic Streams: a Microcosm Study.贫营养溪流中早期微生物分解的 litter 质量比温度的驱动作用更强:一项微宇宙研究。
Microb Ecol. 2021 Nov;82(4):897-908. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01858-w. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
7
Multiple stressors affecting microbial decomposer and litter decomposition in restored urban streams: Assessing effects of salinization, increased temperature, and reduced flow velocity in a field mesocosm experiment.多种胁迫因子对恢复城市溪流中微生物分解者和凋落物分解的影响:在野外中观模拟实验中评估盐度升高、温度升高和流速降低的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Sep 15;943:173669. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173669. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
8
Invasive Acacia Tree Species Affect Instream Litter Decomposition Through Changes in Water Nitrogen Concentration and Litter Characteristics.入侵相思树种通过改变水体氮浓度和凋落物特性来影响溪流凋落物分解。
Microb Ecol. 2021 Jul;82(1):257-273. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01749-0. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Stream salinization and fungal-mediated leaf decomposition: A microcosm study.水流盐度变化与真菌介导的叶片分解:一项微宇宙研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;599-600:1638-1645. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.101. Epub 2017 May 19.
10
Whole-stream nitrate addition affects litter decomposition and associated fungi but not invertebrates.全溪流添加硝酸盐会影响凋落物分解及相关真菌,但对无脊椎动物没有影响。
Oecologia. 2006 Oct;149(4):718-29. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0478-0. Epub 2006 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Hidden Decomposers: the Role of Bacteria and Fungi in Recently Intermittent Alpine Streams Heterotrophic Pathways.隐藏的分解者:细菌和真菌在近期间歇性高山溪流异养途径中的作用。
Microb Ecol. 2023 Oct;86(3):1499-1512. doi: 10.1007/s00248-023-02169-y. Epub 2023 Jan 17.