• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度创伤性脑损伤且格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 15 分的急诊科患者一个月预后预测模型。

A Prognostic Model for Predicting One-Month Outcomes among Emergency Department Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and a Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale of Fifteen.

机构信息

Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2021 Oct 1;38(19):2714-2722. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0137. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2021.0137
PMID:33957761
Abstract

The lack of well-performing prognostic models for early prognostication of outcomes remains a major barrier to improving the clinical care of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We aimed to derive a prognostic model for predicting incomplete recovery at 1-month in emergency department (ED) patients with mTBI and a presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 who were enrolled in the HeadSMART (Head Injury Serum Markers for Assessing Response to Trauma) study. The derivation cohort included 355 participants with complete baseline (day-of-injury) and follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 1-month and incomplete recovery was defined as a GOSE <8. At 1-month post-injury, incomplete recovery was present in 58% ( = 205) of participants. The final multi-variable logistic regression model included six variables: age in years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.00), positive head CT (OR = 4.42; 95% CI: 2.21-9.33), history of depression (OR = 2.59; 95% CI: 1.47-4.69), and self-report of moderate or severe headache (OR = 2.49; 95% CI: 1.49-4.18), difficulty concentrating (OR = 3.17; 95% CI: 1.53-7.04), and photophobia (OR = 4.17; 95% CI: 2.08-8.92) on the day-of-injury. The model was validated internally using bootstrap resampling (1000 resamples), which revealed a mean over-optimism value of 0.01 and an optimism-corrected area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85). A prognostic model for predicting incomplete recovery among ED patients with mTBI and a presenting GCS of 15 using easily obtainable clinical and demographic variables has acceptable discriminative accuracy. External validation of this model is warranted.

摘要

对于轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者,早期预后不良的预测模型仍然缺乏,这是改善其临床治疗的主要障碍。本研究旨在建立一个预测模型,用于预测急诊室(ED)mTBI 患者且格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为 15 分,在基线(受伤当天)和随访数据完整的情况下,预测 1 个月时不能完全恢复的患者。该推导队列包括 355 名参与者。主要结局测量指标为 1 个月时的格拉斯哥预后量表扩展(GOSE),不能完全恢复定义为 GOSE<8。在受伤后 1 个月时,58%(205 名)参与者存在不能完全恢复的情况。最终的多变量逻辑回归模型包括 6 个变量:年龄(OR=0.98;95%置信区间[CI]:0.97-1.00)、阳性头颅 CT(OR=4.42;95%CI:2.21-9.33)、抑郁史(OR=2.59;95%CI:1.47-4.69)、受伤当天报告中度或重度头痛(OR=2.49;95%CI:1.49-4.18)、注意力难以集中(OR=3.17;95%CI:1.53-7.04)和畏光(OR=4.17;95%CI:2.08-8.92)。该模型通过自举重采样(1000 个重采样)进行内部验证,显示平均过度乐观值为 0.01,校正后的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.79(95%CI:0.75-0.85)。该模型使用易于获得的临床和人口统计学变量预测 ED 中 mTBI 患者和 GCS 评分 15 分患者的不完全恢复,具有可接受的鉴别准确性。需要对此模型进行外部验证。

相似文献

1
A Prognostic Model for Predicting One-Month Outcomes among Emergency Department Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and a Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale of Fifteen.轻度创伤性脑损伤且格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为 15 分的急诊科患者一个月预后预测模型。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Oct 1;38(19):2714-2722. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0137. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Early predictors of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (UPFRONT): an observational cohort study.轻度创伤性脑损伤(UPFRONT)后结局的早期预测因素:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jul;16(7):532-540. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30117-5. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
Pathological Computed Tomography Features Associated With Adverse Outcomes After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study With External Validation in CENTER-TBI.轻度创伤性脑损伤后不良结局相关的病理计算机断层扫描特征:TRACK-TBI 研究及其在 CENTER-TBI 中的外部验证。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1137-1148. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2120.
4
Prognostic Models for Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.轻度创伤性脑损伤后全球功能结局和脑震荡后症状的预后模型:一项协作性欧洲神经创伤有效性研究创伤性脑损伤(CENTER-TBI)研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1651-1670. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0320. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Prognostic value of day-of-injury plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations for predicting functional recovery after traumatic brain injury in patients from the US TRACK-TBI cohort: an observational cohort study.伤后第 1 天血浆 GFAP 和 UCH-L1 浓度对美国 TRACK-TBI 队列创伤性脑损伤患者功能恢复的预测价值:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Sep;21(9):803-813. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00256-3.
6
Prediction of Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussive Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Prognostic Models in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.轻度创伤性脑损伤后全球功能结局和脑震荡后症状的预测:协作性欧洲神经创伤效应研究中的创伤性脑损伤(CENTER-TBI)研究中预后模型的外部验证。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jan 15;38(2):196-209. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7074. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Lysophospholipids Are Associated With Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.溶血磷脂与住院轻度创伤性脑损伤患者的结局相关。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Jan;41(1-2):59-72. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0046. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
8
Prediction of Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续性脑震荡后症状的预测。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Nov 15;35(22):2691-2698. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5486. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Treating Children With Mild Head Trauma and Intracranial Injury.发展并验证一种用于治疗儿童轻度头部创伤和颅内损伤的临床风险评分。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Apr 1;171(4):342-349. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4520.
10
Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities.轻度创伤性脑损伤的预后预测:年龄和临床变量比 CT 异常更具预测性。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Apr;27(4):655-68. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1059.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Persisting Post-Concussion Symptoms Among Collegiate Athletes and Military Cadets: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.大学生运动员和军校学员中持续性脑震荡后症状的相关因素:美国大学体育协会 - 美国国防部脑震荡评估、研究与教育联盟的研究结果
Sports Med. 2025 Jan 19. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02168-0.
2
Predicting recovery in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and a normal CT using serum biomarkers and diffusion tensor imaging (CENTER-TBI): an observational cohort study.利用血清生物标志物和弥散张量成像预测轻度创伤性脑损伤且CT正常患者的恢复情况(CENTER-TBI):一项观察性队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 8;75:102751. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102751. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Sensory hypersensitivities are associated with post-traumatic headache-related disability.
感觉过敏与创伤后头痛相关残疾有关。
Headache. 2023 Sep;63(8):1061-1069. doi: 10.1111/head.14604. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
Prognostic Models for Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.轻度创伤性脑损伤后全球功能结局和脑震荡后症状的预后模型:一项协作性欧洲神经创伤有效性研究创伤性脑损伤(CENTER-TBI)研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1651-1670. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0320. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Outcomes in Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Without Acute Intracranial Traumatic Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤但无脑内急性创伤性损伤患者的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2223245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23245.
6
Post-Concussion Symptoms Rule: Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule for Early Prediction of Persistent Symptoms after a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.脑震荡后症状规则:一种用于早期预测轻度创伤性脑损伤后持续症状的临床决策规则的推导和验证。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct;39(19-20):1349-1362. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0026. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
Defining Acute Traumatic Encephalopathy: Methods of the "HEAD Injury Serum Markers and Multi-Modalities for Assessing Response to Trauma" (HeadSMART II) Study.急性创伤性脑病的定义:“头部损伤血清标志物及评估创伤反应的多模态方法”(HeadSMART II)研究方法
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 8;12:733712. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.733712. eCollection 2021.