• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圆窗入路与传统穿颅入路人工耳蜗植入术后频谱分辨率和言语感知的比较

Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique.

机构信息

Departments of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara Medipol University, School of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Ankara Medipol University, School of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Jun;135(6):513-517. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121001183. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1017/S0022215121001183
PMID:33958008
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the spectral resolution achieved with a cochlear implant in users who were implanted using round window route electrode insertion versus a traditional cochleostomy technique.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients were classified into two groups according to the surgical approach: one group (n = 13) underwent cochlear implantation via the round window technique and the other group (n = 13) underwent surgery via cochleostomy.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found in spectral ripple discrimination scores between the round window and cochleostomy groups. The round window group performed almost two times better than the cochleostomy group. Differences between Turkish matrix sentence test scores were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The spectral ripple discrimination scores of patients who had undergone round window cochlear implant electrode insertion were superior to those of patients whose cochlear implants were inserted using a classical cochleostomy technique.

摘要

目的

评估使用圆窗入路电极插入与传统耳蜗造瘘术技术植入的患者所获得的频谱分辨率。

方法

根据手术方法将 26 名患者分为两组:一组(n = 13)通过圆窗技术进行耳蜗植入,另一组(n = 13)通过耳蜗造瘘术进行手术。

结果

在圆窗和耳蜗造瘘组之间,频谱波纹辨别得分存在统计学显著差异。圆窗组的表现几乎比耳蜗造瘘组好两倍。土耳其矩阵句子测试得分之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

进行圆窗耳蜗植入电极插入的患者的频谱波纹辨别得分优于使用经典耳蜗造瘘术技术植入的患者。

相似文献

1
Spectral resolution and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the round window versus cochleostomy technique.圆窗入路与传统穿颅入路人工耳蜗植入术后频谱分辨率和言语感知的比较
J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Jun;135(6):513-517. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121001183. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.初次激活时经圆窗与耳蜗开窗途径使用直窄电极的放射学结果及听力保留情况
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):993-1000. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000726.
3
Cochlear implantation outcomes with round window electrode insertion versus cochleostomy insertion.圆窗电极插入与耳蜗造口术插入的人工耳蜗植入效果比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Nov;138:110272. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110272. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
4
Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window versus Cochleostomy: An Analysis of 40 Patients.使用圆窗与耳蜗造口术进行人工耳蜗植入术后12个月时的电极阻抗与言语感知比较:40例患者的分析
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2018;80(5-6):248-258. doi: 10.1159/000490764. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
5
Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.经圆窗而非耳蜗造口术进行的人工耳蜗植入干预导致的迟发性低频听力损失。
Hear Res. 2016 Mar;333:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
6
Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.耳蜗造口术与圆窗植入:对听觉系统电声刺激功能结果的影响。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Apr;35(4):613-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000269.
7
Comparison of cochlear implant performance after round window electrode insertion compared with traditional cochleostomy.圆窗电极插入与传统耳蜗造口术比较后的人工耳蜗性能比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 May;148(5):822-6. doi: 10.1177/0194599813479576. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
8
The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants.圆窗:它是首选的“耳蜗造瘘术”吗?130 例连续人工耳蜗植入的经验。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Dec;33(9):1497-501. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31826a52c7.
9
Comparison of depth of electrode insertion between cochleostomy and round window approach: a cadaveric study.鼓室切开术与圆窗入路电极植入深度比较:尸体研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jul;281(7):3547-3555. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08466-7. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
10
The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.圆窗与鼓室切开术对人工耳蜗植入电极位置影响的比较:平板 CT 研究。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep 1;142(9):873-80. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1512.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Scala Tympani Geometry on Insertion Forces during Implantation.鼓室穹窿形态对植入过程中植入体插入力的影响。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;12(11):999. doi: 10.3390/bios12110999.