From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Interventional Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Interventional Neuroradiology Section, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Aug;42(8):1486-1491. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7152. Epub 2021 May 6.
AVFs of the foramen magnum region, including fistulas of the marginal sinus and condylar veins, have complex arterial supply, venous drainage, symptoms, and risk features that are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to present the angioarchitectural and clinical phenotypes of a foramen magnum region AVF from a large, single-center experience.
We retrospectively reviewed cases from a 10-year neurointerventional data base. Arterial and venous angioarchitectural features and clinical presentation were extracted from the medical record. Venous drainage patterns were stratified into 4 groups as follows: type 1 = unrestricted sinus drainage, type 2 = sinus reflux (including the inferior petrosal sinus), type 3 = reflux involving sinuses and cortical veins, and type 4 = restricted cortical vein outflow or perimedullary congestion.
Twenty-eight patients (mean age, 57.9 years; 57.1% men) had 29 foramen magnum region AVFs. There were 11 (37.9%) type 1, nine (31.0%) type 2, six (20.7%) type 3, and 3 (10.3%) type 4 fistulas. Pulsatile tinnitus was the most frequent symptom (82.1%), followed by orbital symptoms (31.0%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (13.8%), cranial nerve XII palsy (10.3%), and other cranial nerve palsy (6.9%). The most frequent arterial supply was the ipsilateral ascending pharyngeal artery (93.1% ipsilateral, 55.5% contralateral), vertebral artery (89.7%), occipital artery (65.5%), and internal carotid artery branches (48.3%).
We present the largest case series of foramen magnum region AVFs to date and show that clinical features relate to angioarchitecture. Orbital symptoms are frequent when sinus reflux is present. Hemorrhage was only observed in type 3 and 4 fistulas.
颅后窝区动静脉瘘(AVF)包括边缘窦和髁静脉瘘,其动脉供血、静脉引流、症状和风险特征复杂,尚未明确。本研究旨在通过大型单中心经验介绍颅后窝区 AVF 的血管构筑和临床表型。
我们回顾性分析了 10 年神经介入数据库中的病例。从病历中提取动脉和静脉血管构筑特征和临床表现。静脉引流模式分为 4 组:1 型=无限制窦回流,2 型=窦反流(包括下岩窦),3 型=窦和皮质静脉反流,4 型=皮质静脉回流受限或髓周充血。
28 例患者(平均年龄 57.9 岁;57.1%为男性)存在 29 例颅后窝区 AVF。其中 11 例(37.9%)为 1 型,9 例(31.0%)为 2 型,6 例(20.7%)为 3 型,3 例(10.3%)为 4 型瘘。搏动性耳鸣是最常见的症状(82.1%),其次是眶症状(31.0%)、蛛网膜下腔出血(13.8%)、第 XII 颅神经麻痹(10.3%)和其他颅神经麻痹(6.9%)。最常见的动脉供血为同侧咽升动脉(93.1%同侧,55.5%对侧)、椎动脉(89.7%)、枕动脉(65.5%)和颈内动脉分支(48.3%)。
我们目前报道了最大的颅后窝区 AVF 病例系列,并表明临床特征与血管构筑有关。当存在窦反流时,眶症状常见。仅在 3 型和 4 型瘘中观察到出血。