Telukuntla Kartik S, Huded Chetan P, Shao Mingyuan, Sobol Tim, Abdallah Mouin, Kravitz Kathleen, Hulseman Michael, Barzilai Benico, Starling Randall C, Svensson Lars G, Nissen Steven E, Khot Umesh N
Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 May 6;4(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00443-2.
Outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge improves continuity of care and reduces readmissions, but rates of follow-up remain low. It is not known whether electronic medical record (EMR)-based tools improve follow-up. The aim of this study was to determine if an EMR-based order to secure cardiology follow-up appointments at hospital discharge would improve follow-up rates and hospital readmission rates. A pre-post interventional study was conducted and evaluated 39,209 cardiovascular medicine discharges within an academic center between 2012 and 2017. Follow-up rates and readmission rates were compared during 2 years prior to EMR-order implementation (pre-order era 2012-2013, n = 12,852) and 4 years after implementation (EMR-order era 2014-2017, n = 26,357). The primary endpoint was 90-day cardiovascular follow-up rates within our health system. In the overall cohort, the mean age of patients was 69.3 years [SD 14.7] and 60.7% (n = 23,827) were male. In the pre-order era, 90-day follow-up was 56.7 ± 0.4% (7286 of 12,852) and increased to 67.9 ± 0.3% (17,888 of 26,357, P < 0.001) in the EMR-order era. The use of the EMR follow-up order was independently associated with increased outpatient follow-up within 90 days after adjusting for patient demographics and payor status (OR 3.28, 95% CI 3.10-3.47, P < 0.001). The 30-day readmission rate in the pre-order era was 12.8% (1642 of 12,852) compared with 13.7% (3601 of 26,357, P = 0.016) in the EMR-order era. An EMR-based appointment order for follow-up appointment scheduling was associated with increased cardiovascular medicine follow-up, but was not associated with an observed reduction in 30-day readmission rates.
出院后的门诊随访可改善医疗连续性并降低再入院率,但随访率仍然较低。基于电子病历(EMR)的工具是否能改善随访情况尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定一项基于EMR的医嘱(即在出院时确保安排心脏病学随访预约)是否会提高随访率和降低医院再入院率。我们进行了一项前后对照的干预性研究,评估了2012年至2017年间某学术中心的39209例心血管内科出院病例。比较了实施EMR医嘱之前2年(预医嘱时代,2012 - 2013年,n = 12852)和实施之后4年(EMR医嘱时代,2014 - 2017年,n = 26357)的随访率和再入院率。主要终点是我们医疗系统内的90天心血管随访率。在整个队列中,患者的平均年龄为69.3岁[标准差14.7],男性占60.7%(n = 23827)。在预医嘱时代,90天随访率为56.7±0.4%(12852例中的7286例),在EMR医嘱时代增至67.9±0.3%(26357例中的17888例,P < 0.001)。在调整患者人口统计学特征和支付方状态后,使用EMR随访医嘱与90天内门诊随访增加独立相关(比值比3.28,95%置信区间3.10 - 3.47,P < 0.001)。预医嘱时代的30天再入院率为12.8%(12852例中的1642例),而EMR医嘱时代为13.7%(26357例中的3601例,P = 0.016)。基于EMR的随访预约安排医嘱与心血管内科随访增加相关,但与观察到的30天再入院率降低无关。