• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越假设,理解欺凌中的关系动态。

Looking Beyond Assumptions to Understand Relationship Dynamics in Bullying.

作者信息

Mishna Faye, Birze Arija, Greenblatt Andrea, Pepler Debra

机构信息

Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 20;12:661724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661724. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661724
PMID:33959082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8093771/
Abstract

To account for the complex relationships and processes that constitute the phenomenon of bullying, it is critical to understand how students and their parents and teachers conceptualize traditional and cyberbullying. Qualitative data were drawn from a mixed methods longitudinal study on cyberbullying. Semi-structured interviews were held with Canadian students in grades 4, 7, and 10 in a large urban school board, and their parents and teachers. To account for the complexity and interactions of different systems of relationships, the purpose of the current article is to examine how students and their matched parents and teachers understand traditional and cyberbullying. Central to participants' understanding of traditional and cyberbullying was whether they considered bullying to represent harmful relationship dynamics. Three main assumptions emerged as shaping participants' understanding of bullying and appeared to obscure the deep relationship processes in bullying: (a) assumptions of gender in bullying, (b) type of bullying-comparing traditional and cyberbullying, and (c) physical bullying as disconnected from relationship dynamics. It is essential that assessment, education, and prevention and intervention strategies in traditional and cyberbullying be informed by the inherent relationships in bullying and be implemented at multiple levels of relationships and broader social systems.

摘要

为了解构成欺凌现象的复杂关系和过程,理解学生及其家长和教师如何界定传统欺凌和网络欺凌至关重要。定性数据取自一项关于网络欺凌的混合方法纵向研究。对一个大型城市学区的四年级、七年级和十年级的加拿大学生及其家长和教师进行了半结构化访谈。为了说明不同关系系统的复杂性和相互作用,本文旨在探讨学生及其配对的家长和教师如何理解传统欺凌和网络欺凌。参与者对传统欺凌和网络欺凌的理解核心在于他们是否认为欺凌代表有害的关系动态。出现了三个主要假设塑造了参与者对欺凌的理解,并且似乎掩盖了欺凌中深层次的关系过程:(a) 欺凌中的性别假设,(b) 欺凌类型——比较传统欺凌和网络欺凌,以及 (c) 将身体欺凌与关系动态相分离。传统欺凌和网络欺凌的评估、教育以及预防和干预策略必须基于欺凌中固有的关系,并在多层次的关系和更广泛的社会系统中实施,这一点至关重要。

相似文献

1
Looking Beyond Assumptions to Understand Relationship Dynamics in Bullying.超越假设,理解欺凌中的关系动态。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 20;12:661724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661724. eCollection 2021.
2
Experiences and Perspectives of Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents in Mainland China-Implications for Policy.中国大陆青少年传统欺凌和网络欺凌的经历与观点——对政策的启示
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 6;12:672223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672223. eCollection 2021.
3
Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program media heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying.网络欺凌预防项目“媒体英雄”对传统欺凌行为的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):157-65. doi: 10.1002/ab.21637.
4
Prevalence, Motivations, and Social, Mental Health and Health Consequences of Cyberbullying Among School-Aged Children and Youth: Protocol of a Longitudinal and Multi-Perspective Mixed Method Study.学龄儿童和青少年网络欺凌的患病率、动机及其对社会、心理健康和健康的影响:一项纵向和多视角混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 May 24;5(2):e83. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5292.
5
Longitudinal impact of the Cyber Friendly Schools program on adolescents' cyberbullying behavior.网络友好学校项目对青少年网络欺凌行为的纵向影响。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):166-80. doi: 10.1002/ab.21609. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
6
Understanding Bullying and Cyberbullying Through an Ecological Systems Framework: the Value of Qualitative Interviewing in a Mixed Methods Approach.通过生态系统框架理解欺凌和网络欺凌:定性访谈在混合方法中的价值。
Int J Bullying Prev. 2022;4(3):220-229. doi: 10.1007/s42380-022-00126-w. Epub 2022 May 10.
7
School Administrator Perceptions of Cyberbullying Facilitators and Barriers to Preventive Action: A Qualitative Study.学校管理人员对网络欺凌促成因素及预防行动障碍的看法:一项定性研究
Health Educ Behav. 2017 Jun;44(3):476-484. doi: 10.1177/1090198116673814. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Australian Early Childhood Teachers' Understanding of Bullying.澳大利亚幼儿教师对欺凌的理解。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Aug;37(15-16):NP13766-NP13790. doi: 10.1177/08862605211006355. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
[Study on the relationship between traditional bullying, cyberbullying and depression in adolescents].青少年传统欺凌、网络欺凌与抑郁之间的关系研究
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Aug;49(8):722-7.
10
The potential role of subjective wellbeing and gender in the relationship between bullying or cyberbullying and suicidal ideation.主观幸福感和性别在欺凌或网络欺凌与自杀意念之间关系中的潜在作用。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.043. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Bullying and Cyberbullying Through an Ecological Systems Framework: the Value of Qualitative Interviewing in a Mixed Methods Approach.通过生态系统框架理解欺凌和网络欺凌:定性访谈在混合方法中的价值。
Int J Bullying Prev. 2022;4(3):220-229. doi: 10.1007/s42380-022-00126-w. Epub 2022 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Transformation of Adolescent Peer Relations in the Social Media Context: Part 1-A Theoretical Framework and Application to Dyadic Peer Relationships.社交媒体环境下青少年同伴关系的转变:第 1 部分——理论框架及其在对偶同伴关系中的应用。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;21(3):267-294. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x.
2
Gender differences in aggression.攻击性的性别差异。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Feb;19:39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.030. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
3
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions.学校欺凌:知识现状与有效干预。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Mar;22(sup1):240-253. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
The combined effects of teacher-child and peer relationships on children's social-emotional adjustment.师生关系和同伴关系对儿童社会情感适应的综合影响。
J Sch Psychol. 2016 Dec;59:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
5
Prevalence, Motivations, and Social, Mental Health and Health Consequences of Cyberbullying Among School-Aged Children and Youth: Protocol of a Longitudinal and Multi-Perspective Mixed Method Study.学龄儿童和青少年网络欺凌的患病率、动机及其对社会、心理健康和健康的影响:一项纵向和多视角混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 May 24;5(2):e83. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5292.
6
A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes.理解欺凌行为的关系框架:发展前因与后果
Am Psychol. 2015 May-Jun;70(4):311-21. doi: 10.1037/a0038658.
7
Bullying of youth with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, or typical development: Victim and parent perspectives.自闭症谱系障碍、智力残疾或发育正常的青少年遭受欺凌:受害者及家长的观点。
Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2014 Sep 1;8(9):1173-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.001.
8
Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization.在欺凌受害的更大背景下定义和衡量网络欺凌。
J Adolesc Health. 2012 Jul;51(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.12.031. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
9
A Multilevel Perspective on the Climate of Bullying: Discrepancies Among Students, School Staff, and Parents.校园霸凌氛围的多层次视角:学生、学校工作人员和家长之间的差异
J Sch Violence. 2011 Jan 1;10(2):115-132. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2010.539164.
10
Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters.界定网络欺凌:一项关于青少年认知的定性研究。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Aug;11(4):499-503. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0042.