Thomsen Jennifer, Thomsen Bastian, Copeland Kellen, Coose Sarah, Blackwell Sean, Dante Vitoria
Multispecies Livelihoods Lab, Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.
School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, Kellogg College, Institue of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 20;8:654572. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.654572. eCollection 2021.
This paper explored the role that social entrepreneurship may play in helping to improve euthanasia and live release rates in animal shelters. This paper used a qualitative, comparative ethnographic study that included semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and archival research. It compared two large animal shelters from the U.S. and Australia. Collectively, 21 formal interviews, more than 30 informal interviews, and participant observation were conducted over a 6-month time frame between the two countries. Findings indicate that three main factors may contribute to the transformation of non-profit animals shelters and result in improved euthanasia and live release rates, as well as animal caregiver burnout. These include: (1) professionalizing shelter management, (2) engaging with non-profit social enterprise activities, and (3) improving the efficiency of daily operations. In this paper, we argue that by embracing non-profit social enterprise activities, animal shelters may improve anthropocentric animal shelter activities to positively affect human and non-human rights, welfare, and agency. We do not contend that non-profit animal shelters should sacrifice their stated mission or ethics to include business practices. Rather, by professionalizing management and operations that include self-sustaining diverse revenue streams, it may free up time and resources to make a greater effect in positive non-human animal welfare and outcomes.
本文探讨了社会创业在帮助提高动物收容所的安乐死率和活体放生率方面可能发挥的作用。本文采用了定性的比较民族志研究方法,包括半结构化访谈、参与观察和档案研究。它比较了美国和澳大利亚的两个大型动物收容所。在两国为期6个月的时间里,总共进行了21次正式访谈、30多次非正式访谈以及参与观察。研究结果表明,三个主要因素可能有助于非营利性动物收容所的转型,并提高安乐死率和活体放生率,以及减少动物护理人员的倦怠。这些因素包括:(1)使收容所管理专业化;(2)参与非营利性社会企业活动;(3)提高日常运营效率。在本文中,我们认为,通过开展非营利性社会企业活动,动物收容所可以改善以人类为中心的动物收容所活动,从而对人类和非人类的权利、福利及能动性产生积极影响。我们并非主张非营利性动物收容所应牺牲其既定使命或道德准则来纳入商业行为。相反,通过使包括自我维持的多样化收入来源的管理和运营专业化,它可能会腾出时间和资源,以便在积极的非人类动物福利和成果方面产生更大影响。