High-quality research is needed much more than commonly published (low-quality) meta-analyses.
作者信息
Kezirian Eric James
机构信息
University of Southern California Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
出版信息
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Sep 1;17(9):1961-1962. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9366.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
High-quality research is needed much more than commonly published (low-quality) meta-analyses.与通常发表的（低质量）荟萃分析相比，高质量研究的需求要大得多。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Sep 1;17(9):1961-1962. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9366.
2
Methodological quality of meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO: leads for enhancements: a meta-epidemiological study.PsycINFO索引的荟萃分析的方法学质量：改进方向：一项元流行病学研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 3;10(8):e036349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036349.
3
Methodological quality of meta-analyses of single-case experimental studies.单项实验研究荟萃分析的方法学质量。
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Aug;79:97-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.016. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.开放获取期刊和订阅期刊发表研究的质量评估：系统评价结果
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154217. eCollection 2016.
5
The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.Cochrane系统评价数据库中重症监护荟萃分析报告的质量：一项独立评估。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000253394.15628.FD.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Reporting and Reproducibility of Meta-Analysis in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.Meta 分析在言语、语言和听力研究中的报告和可重复性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jul 16;64(7):2786-2793. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00047. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
8
Panning for the gold in health research: incorporating studies' methodological quality in meta-analysis.在健康研究中淘金：在荟萃分析中纳入研究的方法学质量
Psychol Health. 2015 Jan;30(1):135-52. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.953533. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.网络几何形状和 Cochrane 网络荟萃分析的不一致性有待改进：一项横断面调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002.文献研究表明，1993年至2002年间发表在主流期刊上的荟萃分析方法有所改进。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;60(8):773-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.022. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
引用本文的文献
1
High-quality research is needed in sleep medicine, regardless of the methodological design.睡眠医学领域需要高质量的研究，无论其方法设计如何。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Sep 1;17(9):1963-1964. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9406.
本文引用的文献
1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明：报告系统评价的更新指南》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
2
Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study.睡眠医学领域系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学问题：一项荟萃流行病学研究。
Sleep Med Rev. 2021 Jun;57:101434. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101434. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
3
Publication of meta-analyses in sleep medicine: a scoping review.睡眠医学中荟萃分析的发表：范围综述。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Apr 1;17(4):811-817. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9044.
4
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.高影响力耳鼻喉科期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学质量。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Nov;163(5):892-905. doi: 10.1177/0194599820924621. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2：一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具，该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究，或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
7
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.AMSTAR的开发：一种评估系统评价方法学质量的测量工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Feb 15;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.
Zotero 插件