Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2021 Sep;72(4):1046-1061. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12853. Epub 2021 May 7.
Movement is a recurrent thematic within extant resilience scholarship. Ecological theorizations of resilience emphasize systems that are in constant movement and flux. Terms such as "bouncing back" and "bouncing forward" are frequently used to describe how individuals recover and move on from adversity and trauma. However, integrated individual-systemic explanations of resilience movement dynamics are lacking. Seeking to address this gap, this interdisciplinary article expressly frames resilience as a multi-directional movement process. Individuals do not just move forward and backwards. Rather, they move in multiple and varied ways as they seek to navigate their way through adversity-and through systems and social-ecological traps that both shape how they move and require them to keep moving. Drawing on interview data with victims-/survivors of conflict-related sexual violence in Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH), Colombia, and Uganda, the article empirically explores what "movement" looks like at the microlevel through a focus on everyday forms and expressions of movement, while also examining how wider systemic environments shape and influence these movements.
运动是现有弹性学术研究中的一个反复出现的主题。弹性的生态理论强调处于不断运动和流动的系统。诸如“反弹”和“向前反弹”等术语经常被用来描述个人如何从逆境和创伤中恢复并继续前进。然而，缺乏对弹性运动动态的综合个体-系统解释。为了解决这一差距，本文明确地将弹性定义为一个多向运动过程。个人不仅向前和向后移动。相反，他们会以多种不同的方式移动，因为他们试图在逆境中找到自己的出路——并通过系统和社会生态陷阱找到出路，这些陷阱不仅塑造了他们的移动方式，还要求他们不断移动。本文通过对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那（波黑）、哥伦比亚和乌干达与冲突相关的性暴力受害者/幸存者的访谈数据，通过关注日常形式和运动表达，从微观层面实证探讨了“运动”的样子，同时还考察了更广泛的系统环境如何塑造和影响这些运动。
