Wewalka G, Rotter M, Koller W, Stanek G
Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Oct;165(2):242-9.
The efficacy of 14 procedures for the hygienic disinfection of hands mostly with commerical preparations was tested by a new experimental model developed at the Institute of Hygiene of the university Vienna (1,3). The disinfectant power was clearly dependent on the duration of treatment as well as on the kind of alcohol used in the preparation (n-Propanol better than iso-Propanol better than Ethanol). After one minute the efficacy of all preparations containing one of the three alcohols as active agent was well comparable to that of the standard procedure which according to our proposal (5) uses iso-Propanol 60% (ml/ml) for 1 minute. For preparations with n-Propanol as the main active agent (Satinazid and Sterillium) this was true even after treatment for a period as short as 0.5 min. In our opinion disinfecting detergents are out of place for hygienic disinfection of hands. One preparation representing this group (Versuchspräparat A) was far less effective than the standard procedure.
维也纳大学卫生研究所开发的一种新实验模型,对主要使用商业制剂的14种手部卫生消毒程序的效果进行了测试(1,3)。消毒剂的效力明显取决于处理时间以及制剂中所用酒精的种类(正丙醇优于异丙醇优于乙醇)。一分钟后,所有含有三种酒精之一作为活性剂的制剂的效果与标准程序相当,根据我们的建议(5),标准程序使用60%(毫升/毫升)的异丙醇处理1分钟。对于以正丙醇作为主要活性剂的制剂(Satinazid和Sterillium),即使处理时间短至0.5分钟,情况也是如此。我们认为,消毒洗涤剂不适用于手部卫生消毒。代表该组的一种制剂(Versuchspräparat A)的效果远不如标准程序。