Suppr超能文献

14种手部卫生消毒方法的效果比较(作者译)

[Comparison of efficacy of 14 procedures for the hygienic disinfection of hands (author's transl)].

作者信息

Wewalka G, Rotter M, Koller W, Stanek G

出版信息

Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1977 Oct;165(2):242-9.

PMID:339610
Abstract

The efficacy of 14 procedures for the hygienic disinfection of hands mostly with commerical preparations was tested by a new experimental model developed at the Institute of Hygiene of the university Vienna (1,3). The disinfectant power was clearly dependent on the duration of treatment as well as on the kind of alcohol used in the preparation (n-Propanol better than iso-Propanol better than Ethanol). After one minute the efficacy of all preparations containing one of the three alcohols as active agent was well comparable to that of the standard procedure which according to our proposal (5) uses iso-Propanol 60% (ml/ml) for 1 minute. For preparations with n-Propanol as the main active agent (Satinazid and Sterillium) this was true even after treatment for a period as short as 0.5 min. In our opinion disinfecting detergents are out of place for hygienic disinfection of hands. One preparation representing this group (Versuchspräparat A) was far less effective than the standard procedure.

摘要

维也纳大学卫生研究所开发的一种新实验模型,对主要使用商业制剂的14种手部卫生消毒程序的效果进行了测试(1,3)。消毒剂的效力明显取决于处理时间以及制剂中所用酒精的种类(正丙醇优于异丙醇优于乙醇)。一分钟后,所有含有三种酒精之一作为活性剂的制剂的效果与标准程序相当,根据我们的建议(5),标准程序使用60%(毫升/毫升)的异丙醇处理1分钟。对于以正丙醇作为主要活性剂的制剂(Satinazid和Sterillium),即使处理时间短至0.5分钟,情况也是如此。我们认为,消毒洗涤剂不适用于手部卫生消毒。代表该组的一种制剂(Versuchspräparat A)的效果远不如标准程序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验