• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多学科机械通气撤机方案改善医疗重症监护病房患者的结局并增强医护人员的能力。

Use of a Multidisciplinary Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Protocol to Improve Patient Outcomes and Empower Staff in a Medical Intensive Care Unit.

出版信息

Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2021;40(2):67-74. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000462.

DOI:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000462
PMID:33961373
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation is associated with higher mortality and increased patient complications; conventional physician-directed weaning methods are highly variable and permit significant time that weaning is inefficient and ineffective.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this quality improvement project was to implement a registered nurse (RN)- and respiratory therapist (RT)-driven mechanical ventilation weaning protocol in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care academic medical center.

METHODS

This quality improvement project used a quasi-experimental design with a retrospective usual care group who underwent physician-directed (conventional) weaning (n = 51) and a prospective intervention group who underwent protocol-directed weaning (n = 54). Outcomes included duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, reintubation rates, and RN and RT satisfaction with the weaning protocol.

RESULTS

Patients in the RN- and RT-driven mechanical ventilation weaning protocol group had significantly lower duration of mechanical ventilation (74 vs 152 hours; P = .002) and ICU length of stay (6.7 vs 10.2 days; P = .031). There was no significant difference in reintubation rates between groups. Staff surveys indicate that both RN and RTs were satisfied with the process change.

DISCUSSION

Implementation of a multidisciplinary mechanical ventilation weaning protocol is a safe and effective way to improve patient outcomes and empower ICU staff.

摘要

背景

机械通气时间延长与死亡率升高和患者并发症增加有关;传统的医生主导的撤机方法差异很大,允许撤机效率低下和无效的大量时间。

目的

本质量改进项目的主要目的是在一家三级保健学术医疗中心的重症监护病房(ICU)实施注册护士(RN)和呼吸治疗师(RT)驱动的机械通气撤机方案。

方法

本质量改进项目采用准实验设计,回顾性地将接受医生指导(常规)撤机的患者作为对照组(n=51),前瞻性地将接受方案指导撤机的患者作为干预组(n=54)。结果包括机械通气时间、ICU 住院时间、再插管率以及 RN 和 RT 对撤机方案的满意度。

结果

接受 RN 和 RT 驱动的机械通气撤机方案的患者机械通气时间明显缩短(74 小时对 152 小时;P=0.002),ICU 住院时间也明显缩短(6.7 天对 10.2 天;P=0.031)。两组再插管率无显著差异。工作人员调查表明,RN 和 RT 都对流程改变感到满意。

讨论

实施多学科机械通气撤机方案是改善患者预后和增强 ICU 工作人员能力的安全有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Use of a Multidisciplinary Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Protocol to Improve Patient Outcomes and Empower Staff in a Medical Intensive Care Unit.使用多学科机械通气撤机方案改善医疗重症监护病房患者的结局并增强医护人员的能力。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2021;40(2):67-74. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000462.
2
Nurse-driven, protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation improves clinical outcomes and is well accepted by intensive care unit physicians.护士主导的、基于协议的机械通气撤机策略可改善临床结局,且得到重症监护病房医师的广泛认可。
J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Impact of a nurses' protocol-directed weaning procedure on outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 hours: a prospective cohort study with a matched historical control group.护士方案指导下的撤机程序对机械通气超过48小时患者预后的影响:一项设有匹配历史对照组的前瞻性队列研究
Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):R83-9. doi: 10.1186/cc3030. Epub 2005 Jan 17.
4
A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation.一项关于机械通气撤机的方案指导与医生指导的随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;25(4):567-74. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199704000-00004.
5
Protocol-driven ventilator weaning reduces use of mechanical ventilation, rate of early reintubation, and ventilator-associated pneumonia.方案驱动的呼吸机撤机可减少机械通气的使用、早期再次插管率和呼吸机相关性肺炎。
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):943-51; discussion 951-2. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000124462.61495.45.
6
Protocol-directed vs. physician-directed weaning from ventilator in intra-abdominal surgical patients.腹腔手术患者中基于方案指导与医生指导的呼吸机撤机对比
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Aug;93(8):930-6.
7
Efficacy of weaning protocol in medical intensive care unit of tertiary care center.三级医疗中心重症监护病房撤机方案的疗效
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jan;88(1):52-7.
8
Implementation of a nurse-driven ventilation weaning protocol in critically ill children: Can it improve patient outcome?在危重症儿童中实施护士主导的通气撤机方案:是否能改善患者结局?
Aust Crit Care. 2020 Jan;33(1):80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
A prospective, controlled trial of a protocol-based strategy to discontinue mechanical ventilation.一项关于基于方案的撤机策略的前瞻性对照试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar 15;169(6):673-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200306-761OC. Epub 2004 Jan 15.
10
Protocol-directed weaning conventional weaning from mechanical ventilation for neurocritical patients in an intensive care unit: a nonrandomized quasi-experimental study.协议指导下的撤机与常规撤机对 ICU 神经危重症患者接受机械通气的影响:一项非随机准实验研究。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Mar 1;35(1):44-56. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230340-en.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-led weaning protocols-a systematic review and meta-analysis.由护士主导的撤机方案——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;12:1514287. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1514287. eCollection 2025.
2
Liberation from Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines.重症患者机械通气的撤机:韩国重症医学会临床实践指南
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2024 Oct;87(4):415-439. doi: 10.4046/trd.2024.0039. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
3
Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines.
危重症患者机械通气的撤机:韩国重症医学会临床实践指南
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Feb;39(1):1-23. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00052. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Design of a Clinical Practice Guideline in Nurse-Led Ventilator-Weaning for Nursing Training.基于护士主导的呼吸机撤机临床实践指南的设计用于护理培训。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;9:726647. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.726647. eCollection 2021.