The First Affiliated Hospital, School and Hospital of Stomatology of Zhengzhou University, No. 40 Daxue Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052, China.
J Dent. 2021 Jul;110:103687. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103687. Epub 2021 May 4.
To conduct economic evaluation of two sealing methods (placement of resin sealant or glass ionomer ART sealant) in preventing pit and fissure caries in permanent first molars (PFMs) in schoolchildren.
An outreach dental program was conducted in two randomly selected primary schools, one was covered by the national government-funded dental sealing service (group 1) and the other was not (group 2). Resin or ART sealant (sealant using glass ionomer material with the aid of the finger-press technique) was applied to all of the eligible PFMs in group 1 and group 2 students (grade 1 or 2), respectively. All the applications was provided at school. The cost for sealant application was recorded for each method. After 18 months, a cost minimisation analysis was performed based on the efficacy results of the two methods.
In total, 445 sealants were applied to 126 children in group 1, and 668 sealants were applied to 203 children in group 2. Dental caries incidence was 29.4 % in group 1 and 28.6 % in group 2 after 18 months. Logistic regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.552) between the two groups. Cost minimisation analysis was used to evaluate the economic performance. The analytical model showed that the ART sealant was economically better than resin sealant. Sensitivity analysis showed that the life expectancy of the equipment/instrument used in sealant applications was the major parameter affecting the cost. The cost of using ART sealant over the study period was lower than that of using resin sealant. Overall, ART sealant is a less costly alternative for pit and fissure caries prevention in outreach dental services.
While pit and fissure sealing using ART sealant was as effective as using resin sealant in dental caries prevention, the cost of using ART sealant was lower than that of using resin sealant. Therefore, ART sealant could be a good alternative to resin sealant for pit and fissure caries prevention in outreach dental services for rural populations who have the greatest need.
对两种封闭方法(树脂密封剂或玻璃离子 ART 密封剂)在预防学童恒磨牙(PFMs)窝沟龋中的经济学评价。
在两所随机选择的小学开展了一项外展牙科计划,一所由国家政府资助的牙科封闭服务覆盖(第 1 组),另一所未覆盖(第 2 组)。第 1 组和第 2 组的所有合格 PFMs 分别使用树脂或 ART 密封剂(使用玻璃离子材料并借助指压技术的密封剂)进行处理。所有应用均在学校提供。记录了每种方法的密封剂应用成本。18 个月后,根据两种方法的疗效结果进行成本最小化分析。
共有 126 名第 1 组儿童接受了 445 个密封剂治疗,203 名第 2 组儿童接受了 668 个密封剂治疗。18 个月后,第 1 组的龋齿发病率为 29.4%,第 2 组为 28.6%。Logistic 回归分析显示两组之间无统计学差异(p=0.552)。成本最小化分析用于评估经济性能。分析模型显示,ART 密封剂在经济上优于树脂密封剂。敏感性分析表明,密封剂应用中使用的设备/仪器的预期寿命是影响成本的主要参数。研究期间使用 ART 密封剂的成本低于使用树脂密封剂的成本。总体而言,ART 密封剂是外展牙科服务中预防窝沟龋的一种更经济的选择。
尽管使用 ART 密封剂进行窝沟封闭在预防龋齿方面与使用树脂密封剂一样有效,但使用 ART 密封剂的成本低于使用树脂密封剂。因此,ART 密封剂可能是外展牙科服务中预防窝沟龋的一种替代树脂密封剂的选择,特别是对于最需要的农村人群。