• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用中线微创皮质轨迹螺钉(MidLF)和经椎间孔椎间融合术恢复脊柱前凸:一种安全且住院时间短的技术。

Lordosis Restoration With Midline Minimally Invasive Cortical Trajectory Screws (MidLF) and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Safe Technique With a Short Stay.

作者信息

Rocos Brett, Harding Ian

机构信息

Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Brunel Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):436-440. doi: 10.14444/8065. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.14444/8065
PMID:33963030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8176816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimally invasive cortical trajectory screw (MidLF) technique has been described accompanied with posterolateral interbody fusion (PLIF). We present our 2-year results of a hybrid technique to show that using transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) rather than PLIF in conjunction with MidLF is a less invasive and safe technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 25 patients who underwent MidLF with TLIF from July 2015 through September 2017. The surgical technique was the same for each, with radiological, clinical, and patient-reported outcome data collected and analyzed at a 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The cohort showed a mean age of 55 (35-85) years. The length of hospital stay was between 1 and 4 days, with an average of 2.7 days. Postoperatively, lordosis across the motion segment fused increased by a mean of 7.3° (0°-24°), mean pelvic incidence was 53°(31°-80°), and pelvic tilt reduced by an average of 3.5° (0°-11°). The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 34 preoperatively to 19 postoperatively. Visual analogue pain score-leg improved by 4.7 points, from 6 down to 1. One patient showed delayed wound healing. There were no incidences of neurological injury or durotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that MidLF with TLIF is both less invasive than traditional techniques and safe. It restores lordosis, requires less exposure and retraction of neural elements than the more widely used PLIF, and shows early discharge and satisfactory medium-term patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The MidLF technique with PLIF is less invasive than traditional techniques, restores alignment and shows satisfactory medium term results.

摘要

背景

微创皮质轨迹螺钉(MidLF)技术已与后外侧椎间融合术(PLIF)一同被描述。我们展示了一项混合技术的2年结果,以表明在MidLF技术中使用经椎间孔椎间融合术(TLIF)而非PLIF是一种侵入性更小且安全的技术。

方法

我们回顾性纳入了2015年7月至2017年9月期间接受MidLF联合TLIF手术的25例患者。每位患者的手术技术相同,在2年随访时收集并分析影像学、临床及患者报告的结局数据。

结果

该队列患者的平均年龄为55(35 - 85)岁。住院时间为1至4天,平均为2.7天。术后,融合运动节段的前凸平均增加7.3°(0° - 24°),平均骨盆入射角为53°(31° - 80°),骨盆倾斜平均减少3.5°(0° - 11°)。Oswestry功能障碍指数从术前的34改善至术后的19。视觉模拟疼痛评分 - 腿部从6分改善4.7分至1分。1例患者出现伤口愈合延迟。无神经损伤或硬脊膜切开的发生。

结论

我们的数据表明,MidLF联合TLIF比传统技术侵入性更小且安全。它能恢复前凸,与更广泛使用的PLIF相比,对神经结构的暴露和牵拉更少,并显示出早期出院及中期患者报告结局满意。

证据级别

3级。

临床意义

MidLF联合TLIF技术比传统技术侵入性更小,能恢复对线并显示出满意的中期结果。

相似文献

1
Lordosis Restoration With Midline Minimally Invasive Cortical Trajectory Screws (MidLF) and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Safe Technique With a Short Stay.采用中线微创皮质轨迹螺钉(MidLF)和经椎间孔椎间融合术恢复脊柱前凸:一种安全且住院时间短的技术。
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):436-440. doi: 10.14444/8065. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Clinical and Radiological Comparison between Three Different Minimally Invasive Surgical Fusion Techniques for Single-Level Lumbar Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Minimally Invasive Surgical Posterolateral Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Midline Lumbar Fusion.三种不同微创外科融合技术治疗单节段腰椎峡部裂性和退变性椎体滑脱的临床与影像学比较:微创后外侧融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术及腰椎正中融合术的对比
Asian Spine J. 2018 Oct;12(5):870-879. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.5.870. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
4
Letter to the Editor: "Lordosis Restoration With Midline Minimally Invasive Cortical Trajectory Screws (MidLF) and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Safe Technique With a Short Stay".致编辑的信:“使用中线微创皮质轨迹螺钉(MidLF)和经椎间孔椎间融合术恢复脊柱前凸:一种安全且住院时间短的技术”
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):160-161. doi: 10.14444/8385. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
[Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与传统开放手术治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 1;55(7):543-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.07.013.
6
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
7
Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术疗效的时间进程观察
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2019 Jun 15;59(6):222-230. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0194. Epub 2019 May 9.
8
Clinical outcomes during the learning curve of MIDline Lumbar Fusion (MIDLF®) using the cortical bone trajectory.使用皮质骨轨迹进行腰椎中线融合术(MIDLF®)学习曲线期间的临床结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Jul;158(7):1413-20. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2810-8. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
9
Mini-open pedicle subtraction osteotomy as a treatment for severe adult spinal deformities: case series with initial clinical and radiographic outcomes.微创开放椎弓根截骨术治疗重度成人脊柱畸形:初步临床及影像学结果的病例系列研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):769-76. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15188. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.多节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:与传统经椎间孔椎间融合术的比较
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;85:236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement guided by spinous process clamp hardware in lumbar spinal surgery: a retrospective study.棘突夹硬件引导下的皮质骨轨迹螺钉在腰椎脊柱手术中的准确性:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 30;13(1):16447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43406-1.
2
Letter to the Editor: "Lordosis Restoration With Midline Minimally Invasive Cortical Trajectory Screws (MidLF) and Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Safe Technique With a Short Stay".致编辑的信:“使用中线微创皮质轨迹螺钉(MidLF)和经椎间孔椎间融合术恢复脊柱前凸:一种安全且住院时间短的技术”
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):160-161. doi: 10.14444/8385. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement Using the Midline Lumbar Fusion Technique to Traditional Pedicle Screws: A Case-Control Study.使用中线腰椎融合技术放置皮质骨轨迹螺钉与传统椎弓根螺钉的比较:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Feb 22;13(1):33-38. doi: 10.14444/6005. eCollection 2019 Jan.
2
Minimal invasive surgical technique in midline lumbar inter-body fusion: A technique note.腰椎椎体间中线融合的微创手术技术:技术说明
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;55:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
3
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2016 Jun 8;6(2):e22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.15.00003. eCollection 2016 Jun 22.
4
Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.对于单节段退变性腰椎疾病,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术是否优于开放手术:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Sep 20;13(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0941-8.
5
Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.后路融合术(PLF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1088-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
6
Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.后路腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术联合皮质骨轨迹螺钉与传统椎弓根螺钉固定:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e017227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017227.
8
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylosis: A meta-analysis.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(40):e4995. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004995.
9
Influence of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch on surgical outcomes of short-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸不匹配对短节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术手术疗效的影响
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Aug 20;16:213. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0676-1.
10
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusion in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine.随机对照试验比较退行性腰椎病变中经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与非融合经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。
Global Spine J. 2015 Aug;5(4):322-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549033. Epub 2015 Mar 25.