Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Centro Universitário Mário Palmério (UNIFUCAMP).
Motor Control. 2021 May 7;25(3):423-436. doi: 10.1123/mc.2020-0094.
This study investigated the influence of chronotype on motor behavior in a manual dexterity task performed at different times of the day. Sixteen healthy adults of each chronotype (morning, evening, and neither), as measured by the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, practiced both conditions of the Grooved Pegboard Test either in the morning or in the afternoon to early evening. The "neither" chronotype (65.12 ± 7.46) was outperformed (ps ≤ .03) by both the morning (56.09 ± 7.21) and evening (58.94 ± 7.53) chronotypes when the task had higher cognitive and motor demand but was not outperformed in the task with lower demand (morning = 18.46 ± 2.11; evening = 19.34 ± 2.79; neither = 21.47 ± 2.54; p > .05). No difference between the morning and evening chronotypes was found at the different times of the day (ps > .05), suggesting that a manual dexterity task is not sufficiently demanding to be influenced by chronotype.
这项研究调查了在一天中的不同时间进行手动灵巧性任务时,时型对运动行为的影响。通过 Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire 测量,16 名健康成年人分别属于晨型、晚型和中间型,他们在上午或下午到傍晚早些时候练习了两种不同条件的凹槽钉板测试。当任务具有更高的认知和运动需求时,“中间型”(65.12 ± 7.46)表现优于晨型(56.09 ± 7.21)和晚型(58.94 ± 7.53)(p ≤.03),但在需求较低的任务中并不优于晨型和晚型(晨型= 18.46 ± 2.11;晚型= 19.34 ± 2.79;中间型= 21.47 ± 2.54;p >.05)。在不同的时间点,晨型和晚型之间没有发现差异(p >.05),这表明手动灵巧性任务的要求不足以受到时型的影响。