• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合差距:将运动疗法嵌入相邻癌症病房的前后可行性研究。

Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit.

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University and Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Level 2, 5 Arnold St, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

North Eastern Melbourne Cancer Services and Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6701-6711. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2
PMID:33963458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8105143/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To establish the feasibility of embedding a flexible, exercise-based rehabilitation program into a cancer treatment unit to allow cancer survivors early exercise support.

METHOD

A pre-post study was conducted using Bowen's Framework to describe key domains of feasibility: demand (referrals), acceptability (uptake, attendance, satisfaction), implementation (resources), practicality (adverse events, costs) and limited-efficacy (function, quality of life, self-efficacy). Participants were medically stable, adult cancer survivors receiving curative or palliative treatment for cancer at the health service. Participants completed an 8-week home or hospital-based exercise program. Data were analysed descriptively. Standardised mean differences (Hedge's g) and mean differences were calculated to determine effect size and clinical significance.

RESULTS

The exercise-based rehabilitation service received 155 referrals over 6 months. Of those eligible, 73/119 (61%) commenced. Participants opting for twice-weekly, hospital-based exercise attended 9/16 (56%) sessions. Participants reported high satisfaction and there were no major adverse events. The program utilised existing resources, with the predominant cost being staff. The average health service cost per participant was AUD $1,104. Participants made clinically significant gains in function (6-min walk distance; + 73 m, 95% confidence interval 49 to 96) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global quality of life; + 8 units, 95% confidence interval 3 to 13).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of exercise-based rehabilitation in a co-located cancer unit was safe and feasible. Access, patient and staff education and establishing funding streams are important implementation considerations. Implications for cancer survivors Access to exercise in a cancer unit provides opportunity for early intervention to optimise function during treatment.

摘要

目的

将一个灵活的、基于运动的康复项目嵌入癌症治疗单元,为癌症幸存者提供早期运动支持。

方法

采用鲍文框架(Bowen's Framework)对 8 周的家庭或医院为基础的运动项目进行预-后研究,以描述可行性的关键领域:需求(转介)、可接受性(参与率、出席率、满意度)、实施(资源)、实用性(不良事件、成本)和有限疗效(功能、生活质量、自我效能)。参与者为接受癌症治疗服务的、稳定的、成年癌症幸存者,治疗目的为治愈或姑息治疗。参与者完成了一个 8 周的家庭或医院为基础的运动项目。数据采用描述性分析。标准化均数差(Hedge's g)和均数差用于确定效果大小和临床意义。

结果

基于运动的康复服务在 6 个月内收到了 155 次转介。在符合条件的患者中,73/119(61%)开始了运动项目。选择每周两次、在医院进行运动的患者参加了 9/16(56%)的课程。患者报告满意度高,没有出现重大不良事件。该项目利用了现有资源,主要成本是人员。每位参与者的平均医疗服务成本为 1104 澳元。参与者在功能(6 分钟步行距离;增加 73 米,95%置信区间 49 至 96)和生活质量(EORTC QLQ-C30 全球生活质量;增加 8 个单位,95%置信区间 3 至 13)方面均有显著改善。

结论

在癌症联合治疗单元中实施基于运动的康复是安全且可行的。获得患者和工作人员的教育和建立资金来源是实施的重要考虑因素。对癌症幸存者的影响在癌症单元中进行运动可提供早期干预机会,以优化治疗期间的功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5fb/8105143/3f7a7ae34a8e/520_2021_6261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5fb/8105143/3f7a7ae34a8e/520_2021_6261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5fb/8105143/3f7a7ae34a8e/520_2021_6261_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit.弥合差距:将运动疗法嵌入相邻癌症病房的前后可行性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6701-6711. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06261-2. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
Home-based multidimensional survivorship programmes for breast cancer survivors.针对乳腺癌幸存者的居家多维康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 24;8(8):CD011152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011152.pub2.
3
Telerehabilitation's Safety, Feasibility, and Exercise Uptake in Cancer Survivors: Process Evaluation.远程康复在癌症幸存者中的安全性、可行性及运动参与情况:过程评估
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Dec 21;7(4):e33130. doi: 10.2196/33130.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of home-based strength training in endometrial cancer survivors.基于家庭的力量训练在子宫内膜癌幸存者中的可行性和可接受性。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Feb;17(1):120-129. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-00990-3. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
5
Feasibility and Effects of a Supervised Exercise Program Suitable for Independent Training at Home on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study.适合头颈部癌症患者在家独立训练的监督运动方案对身体功能和生活质量的可行性和效果:一项初步研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1534735420918935. doi: 10.1177/1534735420918935.
6
Efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel technology-based intervention to support physical activity in cancer survivors.一种基于新技术的干预措施对癌症幸存者身体活动的有效性、可行性和可接受性。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1291-1300. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3523-5. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.以目标为导向的认知康复治疗早期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆: GREAT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
8
Exercise Among Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Feasibility and Pre-/Post-Test Exploratory Pilot Study.卵巢癌女性的运动:一项可行性及测试前/后探索性试点研究。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 May 1;44(3):366-374. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.366-374.
9
Triathlon training for women breast cancer survivors: feasibility and initial efficacy.针对女性乳腺癌幸存者的铁人三项训练:可行性与初步疗效
Support Care Cancer. 2017 May;25(5):1465-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3531-5. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
10
A community-based exercise program to increase participation in physical activities among youth with disability: a feasibility study.社区为基础的锻炼计划增加残疾青少年参与体育活动:可行性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 May;41(10):1152-1159. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1422034. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning and evaluating an integrated clinical exercise oncology service: an exploratory mixed-methods study.规划和评估综合临床肿瘤学服务:一项探索性混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11797-0.
2
Integration of exercise prescription into medical provision as a treatment for non-communicable diseases: A scoping review.将运动处方融入医疗服务中以治疗非传染性疾病:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 12;11:1126244. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1126244. eCollection 2023.
3
Building the plane while it's flying: implementation lessons from integrating a co-located exercise clinic into oncology care.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing Exercise in Healthcare Settings: The Potential of Implementation Science.在医疗保健环境中实施锻炼:实施科学的潜力。
Sports Med. 2020 Jan;50(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01228-0.
2
Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an 18-week supervised exercise program in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation: results from the EXIST study.自体干细胞移植治疗患者 18 周监督下运动方案的长期效果和成本效益:来自 EXIST 研究的结果。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Aug;13(4):558-569. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00775-9. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
3
Development, implementation, and effects of a cancer center's exercise-oncology program.
边飞边建飞机:将联合坐诊式运动诊所融入肿瘤治疗中的实施经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 6;22(1):1235. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08607-w.
4
Implementation of a Standard Care Program of Therapeutic Exercise in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.实施转移性乳腺癌患者的标准治疗性运动方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;19(18):11203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811203.
5
Efficacy of Group Exercise-Based Cancer Rehabilitation Delivered via Telehealth (TeleCaRe): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于团体运动的癌症康复远程医疗服务(TeleCaRe)的疗效:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 18;11(7):e38553. doi: 10.2196/38553.
6
Feasibility of Implementing Cancer-Specific Community-Based Exercise Programming: A Multi-Centre Randomized Trial.实施基于社区的癌症特异性运动计划的可行性:一项多中心随机试验。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 31;14(11):2737. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112737.
7
A scoping review examining the integration of exercise services in clinical oncology settings.一项范围综述,旨在研究将运动服务融入临床肿瘤学环境的情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 21;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07598-y.
癌症中心运动肿瘤学计划的制定、实施和效果。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;125(19):3437-3447. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32297. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Impact of exercise on chemotherapy completion rate: A systematic review of the evidence and recommendations for future exercise oncology research.运动对化疗完成率的影响:系统评价证据及对未来运动肿瘤学研究的建议。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Apr;136:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
5
Motivational interviewing added to oncology rehabilitation did not improve moderate-intensity physical activity in cancer survivors: a randomised trial.动机性访谈联合肿瘤康复对改善癌症幸存者的中强度体力活动没有效果:一项随机试验。
J Physiother. 2018 Oct;64(4):255-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
6
'A good stepping stone to normality': a qualitative study of cancer survivors' experiences of an exercise-based rehabilitation program.“迈向正常生活的良好垫脚石”:一项基于运动的康复计划对癌症幸存者体验的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1729-1736. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4429-1. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
7
Physical activity programming and counseling preferences among cancer survivors: a systematic review.癌症幸存者的身体活动规划和咨询偏好:系统综述。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jun 7;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0680-6.
8
Clinical Oncology Society of Australia position statement on exercise in cancer care.澳大利亚临床肿瘤学会关于癌症治疗中运动的立场声明。
Med J Aust. 2018 Aug 20;209(4):184-187. doi: 10.5694/mja18.00199. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Physical activity and annual medical outlay in U.S. colorectal, breast and prostate cancer survivors.美国结直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌幸存者的身体活动与年度医疗支出
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Feb 2;9:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.003. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Physical exercise prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A feasibility study.造血干细胞移植前的体育锻炼:一项可行性研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Oct;34(10):747-756. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1423655. Epub 2018 Jan 16.