• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

突发公共卫生事件中临时应急协调小组的有效性。

Effectiveness of Emergent Ad Hoc Coordination Groups in Public Health Emergencies.

作者信息

Kim Yushim, Lee Kangbae, Oh Seong Soo, Park Heejin

机构信息

School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):5-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.13751. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13751
PMID:33963596
Abstract

Whether emergent groups positively or negatively influence a disaster response remains inconclusive in the literature. We analyzed the effect of an emergent group on two interorganizational networks for information communication and resource coordination during a public health emergency response. Using the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) Coronavirus in Korea as a study case, we identified an ad hoc entity that appeared in both networks. This emergent group, which consists of government officials and public health specialists, directed and coordinated organizations at the center of the response networks. We found that the emergent group positively contributed to efficient information communication but had no effect on the resource network's efficiency. Our interpretation is that the ad hoc entity was filling relational gaps in the information network, but was redundant in the resource network.

摘要

应急群体对灾害应对产生的影响究竟是积极还是消极,在文献中尚无定论。我们分析了一个应急群体在公共卫生应急响应期间对两个用于信息沟通和资源协调的组织间网络所产生的影响。以2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征(MERS)冠状病毒疫情为例,我们确定了一个在两个网络中均出现的特别实体。这个由政府官员和公共卫生专家组成的应急群体,在响应网络的核心位置指挥和协调各组织。我们发现,该应急群体对高效信息沟通有积极贡献,但对资源网络的效率没有影响。我们的解读是,这个特别实体填补了信息网络中的关系空白,但在资源网络中是多余的。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Emergent Ad Hoc Coordination Groups in Public Health Emergencies.突发公共卫生事件中临时应急协调小组的有效性。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):5-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.13751. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Interorganizational Coordination and Collaboration During the 2015 MERS-CoV Response in South Korea.2015 年韩国中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)应对期间的组织间协调与合作。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Aug;15(4):409-415. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.32. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
Dynamics of Interorganizational Public Health Emergency Management Networks: Following the 2015 MERS Response in South Korea.组织间公共卫生应急管理网络的动态:以2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征应对为例
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018 Apr;30(3):207-216. doi: 10.1177/1010539518762847. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Public Health Network Structure and Collaboration Effectiveness during the 2015 MERS Outbreak in South Korea: An Institutional Collective Action Framework.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间的公共卫生网络结构与协作成效:一个制度性集体行动框架
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 15;14(9):1064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091064.
5
A Comparative Analysis of Factors Influencing Two Outbreaks of Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea.中東呼吸綜合症(MERS)在沙烏地阿拉伯和韓國爆發的兩次疫情的影響因素比較分析。
Viruses. 2019 Dec 3;11(12):1119. doi: 10.3390/v11121119.
6
The Dynamics of Cross-Sector Collaboration in Centralized Disaster Governance: A Network Study of Interorganizational Collaborations during the MERS Epidemic in South Korea.集中式灾害治理中的跨部门合作动态:韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间组织间合作的网络研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010018.
7
Communicating about the Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak to the international community and in-country foreigners, Republic of Korea, 2015.2015年,大韩民国就中东呼吸综合征疫情向国际社会及国内外国人进行信息通报。
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2016 Feb 24;7(1):29-31. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2015.6.4.002. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
8
Is Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as Effective as Vaccination for Preventing Virus Diffusion? Measuring the Impacts of Failure in CERC with MERS-CoV Outbreak in South Korea.危机和应急风险沟通是否像疫苗接种一样有效预防病毒传播?用韩国中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒爆发来衡量危机和应急风险沟通失败的影响。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jul;42(7):1504-1523. doi: 10.1111/risa.13842. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
South Korea scrambles to contain MERS virus.韩国全力应对中东呼吸综合征病毒。
BMJ. 2015 Jun 5;350:h3095. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3095.
10
The Effects of Social Determinants on Public Health Emergency Preparedness Mediated by Health Communication: The 2015 MERS Outbreak in South Korea.社会决定因素对健康传播中介的公共卫生应急准备的影响:2015 年韩国 MERS 爆发。
Health Commun. 2020 Oct;35(11):1396-1406. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1636342. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers and collaborative governance of public health emergency response in the context of digital city.数字城市背景下公共卫生应急响应的驱动因素与协同治理
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1417490. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1417490. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of health education during public health emergencies on the health literacy, emotion and coping style of Chinese junior middle school students: a randomized controlled trial.突发公共卫生事件健康教育对我国初中生健康素养、情绪及应对方式的影响:随机对照试验
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):2187. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17108-2.
3
Global systemic risk and resilience for novel coronavirus in postpandemic era.
后疫情时代新型冠状病毒的全球系统性风险和弹性。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/risa.13873.