Suppr超能文献

下段食管癌及食管胃结合部癌新辅助放化疗中低剂量与高剂量放疗的临床疗效比较:系统评价。

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Between Lower and Higher Radiation Doses for Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Radio-Chemotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Provincial Corps Hospital, Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Oct 1;111(2):405-416. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 May 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) plus surgery has been a standard treatment for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer and carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (EC/GEJ), but the optimal preoperative radiation dose is still unclear. We performed this systematic review to explore the treatment efficacy and toxicity of different radiation dose levels and find an optimal dose-fractionation strategy in EC/GEJ patients receiving nCRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Embase and Ovid Medline were searched for articles involving cases of operable squamous and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ in which patients received nCRT up to a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions that were published until July 2019, when the search was performed. Physical dose distributions were converted to biologically equivalent doses (BEDs), which were described in units of gray (alpha/beta). Pooled rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), failure patterns, and toxicities were compared between lower-dose radiation therapy (LDRT; BED ≤48.85 Gy) and higher-dose radiation therapy (HDRT; BED >48.85 Gy) for patients treated with nCRT.

RESULTS

A total of 110 studies with 7577 EC/GEJ patients receiving nCRT were included in this pooled analysis. Both the PFS and OS rates of patients receiving LDRT were significantly higher than those of patients receiving HDRT. Patients receiving LDRT had improved safety regarding treatment-related adverse events and lower distant failure rates than patients receiving HDRT. Utilization of modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal RT and intensity modulated RT, was associated with improved oncologic outcomes compared with 2-dimensional methods. Subgroup analysis showed that EC/GEJ patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiation to a dose of 40.0 to 41.4 Gy in 20-23 fractions showed improved OS compared with those receiving radiation above this dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the limited data, nCRT using BED ≤48.85 Gy was suitable for locoregionally advanced, resectable EC/GEJ. A total dose of 40.0 to 41.4 Gy in 20 to 23 fractions using modern RT techniques might provide the optimal therapeutic ratio.

摘要

目的

新辅助放化疗(nCRT)加手术已成为局部晚期食管癌和胃食管交界处(EC/GEJ)癌的标准治疗方法,但最佳术前放疗剂量仍不清楚。我们进行了这项系统评价,以探讨不同放疗剂量水平的治疗效果和毒性,并为接受 nCRT 的 EC/GEJ 患者找到最佳的剂量分割策略。

方法和材料

我们在 Embase 和 Ovid Medline 上检索了截至 2019 年 7 月发表的可手术的食管和 GEJ 鳞癌和腺癌病例的文章,这些病例接受了最高 50.4 Gy/28 次的 nCRT,其中物理剂量分布被转换为生物等效剂量(BED),单位为格雷(α/β)。将接受 nCRT 的低剂量放疗(LDRT;BED≤48.85 Gy)和高剂量放疗(HDRT;BED>48.85 Gy)患者的总生存率(OS)、无进展生存率(PFS)、失败模式和毒性的汇总率进行比较。

结果

共有 110 项研究,纳入了 7577 例接受 nCRT 的 EC/GEJ 患者,纳入了本荟萃分析。接受 LDRT 的患者的 PFS 和 OS 率均明显高于接受 HDRT 的患者。接受 LDRT 的患者在治疗相关不良事件方面安全性更高,远处失败率更低。与二维方法相比,包括三维适形放疗和调强放疗在内的现代放疗技术的应用与肿瘤学结果的改善相关。亚组分析显示,接受常规分割放疗至 40.0-41.4 Gy/20-23 次的 EC/GEJ 患者 OS 优于接受该剂量以上放疗的患者。

结论

基于有限的数据,接受 BED≤48.85 Gy 的 nCRT 适用于局部晚期可切除的 EC/GEJ。使用现代放疗技术进行 40.0-41.4 Gy/20-23 次分割的总剂量可能提供最佳的治疗比例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验