Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
J Surg Res. 2021 Sep;265:259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.048. Epub 2021 May 5.
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) appendicitis severity grading criteria use independent subscales for radiologists (Rad), surgeons (Surg), and pathologists (Path). We reviewed the EAST Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous (MUSTANG) database to determine rates of discordance and clinical consequences of inaccuracy.
A confusion matrix was constructed for pairs among Rad, Surg, and Path. Accuracy was reported using chronologically latest diagnosis as gold standard. "Concordance" (C) was achieved when both agreed on the severity grade and "Discordance"(D) when they disagreed. A composite endpoint("COMP"= 30-d incidence of surgical site infection, abscess, wound complication, Clavien-Dindo complication, secondary intervention, ED[Emergency Department] visit, hospital readmission, and mortality) was compared between C versus D groups via χ test with Bonferroni correction to define statistical significance(P = 0.05/9 = 0.005).
For each pair and diagnosis, subjects were categorized as C or D and compared for the incidence of COMP. Incidence of COMP for Surg and/or Path in C versus D: 16% versus. 26% (p = 0.006, NS by Bonferroni) for acute (A), 39% versus 33% (p = 0.39) for gangrenous (G), and 48% versus 37% (p = 0.035, NS by Bonferroni) for perforated (P). For Rad and/or Path in C versus. D: 17% versus 42% (p < 0.001) for A, 27% versus 31% (p = 0.95) for G, and 56% versus 48% (p = 0.48) for P. For C versus D: 17% versus 40% (p < 0.001) for A, 36% versus 26% (p = 0.43) for G, and 51% versus 39% (p = 0.29) for P.
In appendicitis treated by appendectomy, surgeons are most accurate at diagnosing acute appendicitis and least accurate at diagnosing gangrenous. Radiologists are less accurate for all categories. When the surgeon is wrong, clinical outcomes are not significantly worse. However, when the radiologist is wrong about acute appendicitis, patients have worse clinical outcomes.
美国外科创伤协会(AAST)的阑尾炎严重程度分级标准为放射科医生(Rad)、外科医生(Surg)和病理科医生(Path)分别使用独立的子量表。我们回顾了东部多中心美国阑尾炎治疗研究:急性、穿孔和坏疽(MUSTANG)数据库,以确定不一致的发生率和不准确的临床后果。
为 Rad、Surg 和 Path 之间的配对构建混淆矩阵。使用最新的时间诊断作为金标准报告准确性。当两者对严重程度等级达成一致时(C),则称为“一致”( Concordance),当两者不一致时(D)则称为“不一致”(Discordance)。通过 χ 检验和 Bonferroni 校正比较 C 与 D 组之间的复合终点(30 天手术部位感染、脓肿、伤口并发症、Clavien-Dindo 并发症、二次干预、急诊科就诊、医院再入院和死亡率)的发生率,以确定统计学意义(P=0.05/9=0.005)。
对于每对和每种诊断,将受试者分为 C 或 D 组,并比较 COMP 的发生率。在 C 与 D 组中,Surg 和/或 Path 的 COMP 发生率为:急性(A)16%对 26%(p=0.006,Bonferroni 无统计学意义),坏疽(G)39%对 33%(p=0.39),穿孔(P)48%对 37%(p=0.035,Bonferroni 无统计学意义)。在 C 与 D 组中,Rad 和/或 Path 的 COMP 发生率为:急性(A)17%对 42%(p<0.001),坏疽(G)27%对 31%(p=0.95),穿孔(P)56%对 48%(p=0.48)。在 C 与 D 组中,C 与 D 组的 COMP 发生率为:急性(A)17%对 40%(p<0.001),坏疽(G)36%对 26%(p=0.43),穿孔(P)51%对 39%(p=0.29)。
在接受阑尾切除术治疗的阑尾炎中,外科医生在诊断急性阑尾炎方面最准确,在诊断坏疽性阑尾炎方面最不准确。放射科医生在所有类别中准确性都较低。当外科医生诊断错误时,临床结果并没有显著恶化。然而,当放射科医生对急性阑尾炎的诊断错误时,患者的临床结果更差。