Suppr超能文献

头孢噻肟加甲硝唑在预防阑尾切除术后伤口脓毒症方面似乎比哌拉西林更有效。一项对比试验的初步结果。

Cefotaxime plus metronidazole appears more effective than piperacillin in the prevention of postappendicectomy wound sepsis. Preliminary results of a comparative trial.

作者信息

Bourke J B, Balfour T W, Elliott J, MacShane L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Nottingham.

出版信息

Drugs. 1988;35 Suppl 2:106-10. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198800352-00023.

Abstract

Metronidazole suppositories have previously been shown to be superior to povidone iodine intraoperative wound spray in reducing postappendicectomy wound sepsis. In subsequent studies metronidazole suppositories and cefotaxime injections reduced the sepsis rate to 9.3%, while the same combination produced a wound sepsis rate of 7.6% compared with 17.2% for cefotaxime alone. In an ongoing study, metronidazole and cefotaxime are now being compared with piperacillin in a single-blind trial. Adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy in Nottingham have been included in this study, which has ethical committee approval. When the decision to perform emergency appendicectomy was made, the patient was randomly allocated a numbered pack. This contained either 3 x 1g injections of cefotaxime and 6 x 1g metronidazole suppositories or 3 x 2g injections of piperacillin and 6 placebos. 40 minutes before operation the patient received the first suppository and the remainder every 8 hours. The patient received the first injection of antibiotic by intravenous or intramuscular injection and the remaining doses 8 and 16 hours later. A wound was regarded as infected if pus discharged either spontaneously or on incision. 175 patients have been studied to date. The treatment groups were well matched for age and sex. Seven of the 77 patients in the cefotaxime/metronidazole group (9.1%) compared with 12 of the 76 in the piperacillin group (15.8%) have developed wound infections. This study confirms that the combination of cefotaxime and metronidazole seems to be more effective than piperacillin alone in the reduction of postappendicectomy wound sepsis. Currently cefotaxime plus metronidazole is the therapy of choice.

摘要

先前已表明,甲硝唑栓剂在降低阑尾切除术后伤口感染方面优于聚维酮碘术中伤口喷雾剂。在随后的研究中,甲硝唑栓剂和头孢噻肟注射剂将感染率降至9.3%,而相同组合的伤口感染率为7.6%,相比之下,仅使用头孢噻肟时感染率为17.2%。在一项正在进行的研究中,目前正在单盲试验中将甲硝唑和头孢噻肟与哌拉西林进行比较。诺丁汉接受急诊阑尾切除术的成年患者已纳入本研究,该研究已获得伦理委员会批准。当决定进行急诊阑尾切除术时,患者被随机分配一个编号包装。其中包含3支1g的头孢噻肟注射剂和6枚1g的甲硝唑栓剂,或者3支2g的哌拉西林注射剂和6枚安慰剂。手术前40分钟,患者接受第一枚栓剂,其余每8小时一枚。患者通过静脉或肌肉注射接受第一剂抗生素,其余剂量在8小时和16小时后注射。如果伤口有自发排出或切开时有脓液排出,则视为感染。迄今为止,已对175名患者进行了研究。治疗组在年龄和性别方面匹配良好。头孢噻肟/甲硝唑组的77名患者中有7名(9.1%)发生伤口感染,而哌拉西林组的76名患者中有12名(15.8%)发生伤口感染。这项研究证实,头孢噻肟和甲硝唑联合使用在降低阑尾切除术后伤口感染方面似乎比单独使用哌拉西林更有效。目前,头孢噻肟加甲硝唑是首选治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验