Suppr超能文献

更多是否总是更好?熟练护理设施中以财务为动机的治疗与患者结局。

Is More Always Better? Financially Motivated Therapy and Patient Outcomes in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle WA; Center for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle WA.

Center for Health Workforce Studies, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle WA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if financially motivated therapy in Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) is associated with patient outcomes.

DESIGN

Cohort study using 2018 Medicare administrative data.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

13,949 SNFs in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

934,677 Medicare Part A patients admitted to SNF for post-acute rehabilitation (N=934,677).

INTERVENTIONS

The primary independent variable was an indicator of financially motivated therapy, separate from intensive therapy, known as thresholding, defined as when SNFs provide 10 or fewer minutes of therapy above weekly reimbursement thresholds.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dichotomous indicators of successful discharge to the community vs institution and functional improvement on measures of transfers, ambulation, or locomotion. Mixed effects models estimated relations between thresholding and community discharge and functional improvement, adjusted for therapy intensity, patient, and facility characteristics. Sensitivity analyses estimated associations between thresholding and outcomes when patients were stratified by therapy volume.

RESULTS

Thresholding was associated with a small positive effect on functional improvement (odds ratio 1.07; 95% CI 1.06-1.09) and community discharge (odds ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05). Effect sizes for functional improvement were consistent across patients receiving different volumes of therapy. However, effect sizes for community discharge were largest for patients in low-volume therapy groups (odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.18-1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who experienced thresholding during post-acute SNF stays were slightly more likely to improve in function and successfully discharge to the community, especially for patients receiving lower volumes of therapy. While thresholding is an inefficient and financially motivated practice, results suggest that even small amounts of extra therapy time may have contributed positively to outcomes for patients receiving lower-volume therapy. As therapy volumes decline in SNFs, these results emphasize the importance of Medicare payment policy designed to promote, not disincentivize, potentially beneficial rehabilitation services for patients.

摘要

目的

确定在熟练护理设施(SNF)中以经济动机进行治疗是否与患者的预后相关。

设计

使用 2018 年医疗保险管理数据的队列研究。

地点和参与者

美国 13949 家 SNF。

参与者

934677 名接受 SNF 急性后康复治疗的 Medicare 部分 A 患者(N=934677)。

干预措施

主要的独立变量是一种以经济动机进行治疗的指标,与强化治疗分开,称为阈值,定义为 SNF 提供的治疗时间每周超过报销阈值 10 分钟或更少。

主要观察指标

成功社区出院与机构内留院的二分变量指标,以及转移、行走或移动功能的改善。混合效应模型估计了阈值与社区出院和功能改善之间的关系,调整了治疗强度、患者和设施特征。敏感性分析估计了当患者按治疗量分层时,阈值与结果之间的关联。

结果

阈值与功能改善(优势比 1.07;95%置信区间 1.06-1.09)和社区出院(优势比 1.03,95%置信区间 1.02-1.05)有轻微的正相关。接受不同治疗量的患者的功能改善效果大小一致。然而,社区出院的效果大小对于接受低治疗量的患者最大(优势比 1.27,95%置信区间 1.18-1.35)。

结论

在急性后 SNF 住院期间经历阈值的患者在功能上稍有改善的可能性更高,并且更有可能成功出院到社区,尤其是接受低治疗量的患者。虽然阈值是一种效率低下且以经济动机为导向的做法,但结果表明,即使是少量的额外治疗时间也可能对接受低治疗量的患者的预后产生积极影响。随着 SNF 中治疗量的减少,这些结果强调了医疗保险支付政策的重要性,该政策旨在促进而不是抑制对患者有益的康复服务。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验