• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创钢板接骨术与切开复位内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折术后锁骨上神经损伤的比较

Comparison of supraclavicular nerve injuries after clavicle mid-shaft surgery via minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation.

作者信息

Ko Sang-Hun, Kim Myung-Seo

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Clinic, College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Clinic, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital At Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1895-1902. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03941-w. Epub 2021 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-021-03941-w
PMID:33966101
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Only a few previous studies have evaluated the factors related to supraclavicular nerve (SCN) injury after clavicle mid-shaft fracture surgery. We analyzed the frequency and risk factors for SCN injury after clavicle mid-shaft fracture surgery via open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases from 59 patients who had undergone surgery for clavicle mid-shaft fractures between January 2018 and April 2019. Twenty-nine patients had undergone ORIF and 30 had undergone MIPO. The frequency of SCN injury in the two groups was evaluated, and preoperative patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, diabetes mellitus, and trauma mechanism), and radiological parameters (fracture displacement and shortening) were measured and evaluated as risk factors for SCN injury. When neurological symptoms, such as numbness, were present on the anterior chest wall or at the incision site, electromyography (EMG) was conducted.

RESULTS

Neurological symptoms were present in 12 patients. Numbness in the anterior upper chest around the incision site was present in eight and four patients who underwent ORIF and MIPO, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, fracture displacement evaluated on preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography was significantly associated with the occurrence of SCN injury in patients who underwent MIPO (odds ratio, 1.038; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.077; p = 0.047). Although EMG was conducted in all patients with SCN injury, peripheral neuropathy was not found in any cases.

CONCLUSIONS

SCN injury, which is a possible complication of clavicle mid-shaft fracture surgery, occurred significantly less frequently in MIPO than in ORIF. In MIPO, greater preoperative fracture displacement was associated with a higher risk of SCN injury. Additional studies are required to reach a consensus regarding accurate methods to evaluate SCN injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series, treatment study.

摘要

引言

以往仅有少数研究评估了锁骨中段骨折手术后与锁骨上神经(SCN)损伤相关的因素。我们通过切开复位内固定(ORIF)与微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)分析了锁骨中段骨折手术后SCN损伤的发生率及危险因素。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2018年1月至2019年4月期间59例接受锁骨中段骨折手术患者的病例。29例患者接受了ORIF,30例接受了MIPO。评估两组中SCN损伤的发生率,并测量和评估术前患者人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟、饮酒、糖尿病和创伤机制)以及放射学参数(骨折移位和缩短)作为SCN损伤的危险因素。当胸壁前部或切口部位出现麻木等神经症状时,进行肌电图(EMG)检查。

结果

12例患者出现神经症状。接受ORIF和MIPO的患者中,分别有8例和4例在切口部位周围的前胸上部出现麻木(p<0.001)。此外,术前三维计算机断层扫描评估的骨折移位与接受MIPO患者的SCN损伤发生显著相关(优势比,1.038;95%置信区间,1.001 - 1.077;p = 0.047)。尽管对所有SCN损伤患者均进行了EMG检查,但未发现任何周围神经病变病例。

结论

SCN损伤是锁骨中段骨折手术的一种可能并发症,MIPO中其发生率明显低于ORIF。在MIPO中,术前骨折移位越大,SCN损伤风险越高。需要进一步研究以就评估SCN损伤的准确方法达成共识。

证据水平

IV,病例系列,治疗研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of supraclavicular nerve injuries after clavicle mid-shaft surgery via minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation.微创钢板接骨术与切开复位内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折术后锁骨上神经损伤的比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1895-1902. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03941-w. Epub 2021 May 9.
2
Comparison of post-operative numbness and patient satisfaction using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open plating for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.微创钢板接骨术与切开钢板内固定治疗急性移位锁骨骨干骨折术后麻木及患者满意度的比较。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
3
Comparison between open plating versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.切开复位钢板内固定术与微创钢板接骨术治疗急性移位锁骨骨干骨折的比较
Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
Comparative study of patients with midshaft clavicle fracture fixed with a locked plate via an open versus percutaneous approach.经皮与开放入路锁定钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折的对比研究。
Injury. 2023 Nov;54 Suppl 6:110746. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.04.033. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
5
Surgical treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures by minimally invasive internal fixation facilitated by intra-operative external fixation: A preliminary study.微创内固定辅助术中外固定治疗锁骨中段骨折:初步研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):847-852. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
[Clinical outcome of internal fixation of middle third clavicle fractures using locking compression plate: comparison between conventional open plating and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis].[使用锁定加压钢板内固定治疗锁骨中1/3骨折的临床结果:传统切开钢板固定与微创钢板接骨术的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 4;103(25):1897-1902. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20221222-02687.
7
[Effectiveness of minimally invasive internal fixation with locking plates for mid-shaft clavicle fractures].锁定钢板微创内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折的疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 15;38(8):947-953. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202404037.
8
Assessing functional and radiological outcomes: open reduction and internal fixation vs. minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humerus shaft fractures - a prospective comparative study.评估功能和影像学结果:肱骨骨干骨折切开复位内固定与微创钢板接骨术的前瞻性比较研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Nov;48(11):2979-2991. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06307-0. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of distal fibula Danis-Weber types B and C fractures.微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)与切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗 Danis-Weber 类型 B 和 C 型腓骨远端骨折。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Oct 22;15(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02018-5.
10
Anterior Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Humeral Shaft Fractures Is Safer Than Open Reduction Internal Fixation: A Matched Case-Controlled Comparison.前侧微创钢板接骨术治疗肱骨干骨折比切开复位内固定更安全:一项匹配的病例对照研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Aug 1;35(8):424-429. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002021.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with mini-open technique versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of displaced midclavicular fracture: a retrospective study.微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)结合微创技术与切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗锁骨中段移位骨折的回顾性研究
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Aug 2;26(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00865-8.
2
Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis with Mini-Open Technique and Supraclavicular Nerve Preservation Reduces Postoperative Numbness in Acute Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture.微创钢板接骨术结合小切口技术和锁骨上神经保留术可减少急性移位锁骨中段骨折术后麻木。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 11;60(10):1669. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101669.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Brachial plexus palsy after clavicle fracture: 3 cases.锁骨骨折后臂丛神经麻痹:3 例。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Feb;29(2):e60-e65. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.027. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
2
Comparison between Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis and Conventional Open Plating for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创钢板内固定与传统切开复位钢板内固定治疗锁骨中段骨折的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Oct 16;2019:7081032. doi: 10.1155/2019/7081032. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique and transverse incisions in the treatment of fractures of the middle and outer third of the clavicle.
Complications and clinical outcomes with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique for midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)治疗锁骨中段骨折的并发症及临床疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
JSES Int. 2023 Nov 28;8(2):257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.10.007. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for clavicle fractures.锁骨骨折的微创钢板接骨术
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Apr;35(2):92-99. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00798-7. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
斜行与横行切口治疗锁骨中外 1/3 骨折的疗效比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jul;28(7):1308-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.021.
4
Surgical treatment of mid-shaft clavicle fractures by minimally invasive internal fixation facilitated by intra-operative external fixation: A preliminary study.微创内固定辅助术中外固定治疗锁骨中段骨折:初步研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):847-852. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.022. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Postoperative chest radiograph after open reduction internal fixation of clavicle fractures: a necessary practice?锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后的胸部 X 线片:有必要常规拍摄吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):e131-e136. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Comparison of post-operative numbness and patient satisfaction using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis or open plating for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.微创钢板接骨术与切开钢板内固定治疗急性移位锁骨骨干骨折术后麻木及患者满意度的比较。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:21-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
7
Comparison of plate osteosynthesis versus non-operative management for mid-shaft clavicle fractures-A prospective study.钢板内固定与非手术治疗中段锁骨骨折的比较——一项前瞻性研究。
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1104-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Nerve conduction study of the three supraclavicular nerve branches.锁骨上神经三支的神经传导研究。
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Aug;58(2):300-303. doi: 10.1002/mus.26105. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
9
Are standard antero-posterior and 20° caudal radiographs a true assessment of mid-shaft clavicular fracture displacement?标准前后位及向尾侧倾斜20°的X线片能否准确评估锁骨中段骨折的移位情况?
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(4):221-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2015.06.004. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Comparison between open plating versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for acute displaced clavicular shaft fractures.切开复位钢板内固定术与微创钢板接骨术治疗急性移位锁骨骨干骨折的比较
Injury. 2015 Aug;46(8):1577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 May 22.