Department of Orthopaedics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamilnadu, PIN-602105, India.
Int Orthop. 2024 Nov;48(11):2979-2991. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06307-0. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
To analyse and compare the functional and radiological outcome of different methods of surgical management of humerus shaft fractures in 30 patients treated by conventional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO).
This prospective interventional study was conducted among 30 patients by dividing into two equal groups over one year and six months. All patients were followed up for a minimum of at least six months. Radiological outcome was assessed using fracture union in serial radiographs and functional outcome was measured using DASH scoring.
The majority of patients (26.7%) were between 18 to 30 years, overall mean age was 44.4 years, most of the patients (50%) had 12A3 AO type fractures, and 73.3% of patients had injuries following two-wheeler road traffic accidents. On comparing multiple factors, we found a statistically significant reduction of intra-operative blood loss in MIPO compared to ORIF. Though time taken for fracture union, functional outcome and complication rate were better in MIPO when compared to ORIF, these differences were not statistically significant. two patients in the MIPO group and one patient in the ORIF group had a peri-implant fracture following slip and fall again within the study period and underwent Revision plating. Excluding cases of peri-implant fractures, out of 13 patients in the MIPO group, only one patient developed fracture non-union. Of 14 patients in the ORIF group, three developed fracture non-union.
MIPO is a safe, reproducible, efficient and good if not a better alternative to ORIF as it offers good radiological and functional outcomes with advantages of minimal soft tissue damage, minimal blood loss, better cosmesis, no incidence of radial nerve palsy and with few concerns such as the need for fluoroscopy, and a learning curve.
分析比较 30 例肱骨骨干骨折患者采用传统切开复位内固定(ORIF)与微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)治疗的功能和影像学结果。
本前瞻性干预研究对 30 例患者进行分组,每组 15 例,随访至少 6 个月,时间跨度为 1 年半。通过比较连续影像学上的骨折愈合情况评估影像学结果,通过 DASH 评分评估功能结果。
患者平均年龄 44.4 岁(范围 18-73 岁),大多数患者(26.7%)年龄在 18-30 岁,50%患者的 AO 12A3 型骨折,73.3%患者因两轮车交通事故受伤。与 ORIF 相比,MIPO 术中出血量明显减少(P<0.05),但骨折愈合时间、功能结果和并发症发生率方面 MIPO 优于 ORIF,但无统计学意义。MIPO 组中有 2 例和 ORIF 组中有 1 例在研究期间再次滑倒导致植入物周围骨折,需要翻修钢板。排除植入物周围骨折病例后,MIPO 组中有 13 例患者仅 1 例发生骨折不愈合,ORIF 组中有 14 例患者发生 3 例骨折不愈合。
MIPO 是一种安全、可重复、有效的方法,其功能和影像学结果与 ORIF 相当甚至更好,因为它具有软组织损伤小、出血量少、美容效果好、桡神经麻痹发生率低等优点,并且透视次数少、学习曲线短。