Singh Sarah
Lecturer in Law, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Chatham Street, L69 7ZR Liverpool, UK.
Fem Leg Stud. 2021;29(2):181-204. doi: 10.1007/s10691-021-09455-5. Epub 2021 May 5.
This article explores the gender dynamics of 'causing or allowing a child to die', contrary to the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, section 5. This offence was intended to allow for prosecution where a child had been killed and it was uncertain who had killed him/her, but also to allow for prosecution of non-violent defendants who failed to protect him/her. More women than men have been charged and convicted of this offence signifying a reversal of usual patterns of prosecution and conviction. This analysis interrogates how section 5 criminalises women who have experienced domestic abuse. Drawing on a case observation, reported cases and media reports of cases, I suggest this offence derives from and perpetuates patriarchal constructs of motherhood. Grounded in a feminist approach building on women's concrete experiences of law, I conclude that section 5 should be amended so that it is only used where it cannot be ascertained which defendant actively harmed a child.
本文探讨了违反2004年《家庭暴力、犯罪与受害者法案》第5条规定的“致使或放任儿童死亡”的性别动态。这项罪行旨在允许在儿童被杀害但不确定谁是凶手的情况下进行起诉,同时也允许对未能保护儿童的非暴力被告进行起诉。被指控并判定犯有此罪的女性多于男性,这表明起诉和定罪的通常模式发生了逆转。本分析审视了第5条如何将遭受家庭虐待的女性定罪。通过一个案例观察、已报道案例以及案例的媒体报道,我认为这项罪行源于并延续了父权制下的母亲身份观念。基于以女性具体法律经历为基础的女权主义方法,我得出结论,第5条应予以修订,使其仅在无法确定哪个被告积极伤害了儿童的情况下使用。