Prabhakar Vaishnavi, Chidambaranathan Ahila Singaravel, Balasubramanium Muthukumar
Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Contemp Clin Dent. 2021 Jan-Mar;12(1):49-54. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_79_20. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
The success of esthetic ceramo-metal restoration is strongly influenced by its bond strength. The success of ceramo-metal restoration is subjective to its bond strength.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength between palladium-based cobalt chromium (Co-Cr) alloy coated with titanium nitride (TiNi) and titanium aluminum nitride with feldspathic ceramics.
According to the International Organization for standardization 9693; technical report 1,140,640 samples were prepared using Palladium-based Co-Cr alloy with ×4 vertical projection resting on 5 mm diameter base. The samples were divided into Group: A (control), Group: B (Sandblasted), Group: C (TiNi coated), and Group: D (titanium aluminum nitride coated by cathodic arc plasma deposition, following which feldspathic ceramic application was performed. Shear bond test was performed using universal testing machine and surface analysis was performed using scanning electron microscope.
The mean shear bond strength for Group A was 172.994 ± 3.739 N, Group B 209.485 ± 5.913 N, Group C 176.536 ± 4.780 N, and Group D 260.576 ± 16.351 N. Comparison within the groups was made using one-way ANOVA, and multiple group comparisons were made using Tukey's honestly significant difference test where the < 0.001was considered statistically significant.
Palladium based Co-Cr alloy coated with titanium aluminum nitride by cathodic plasma arc deposition showed maximum shear bond strength with feldspathic ceramic compared to noncoated, sandblasted, and TiNi coated alloy.
美学型烤瓷熔附金属修复体的成功很大程度上受其粘结强度的影响。烤瓷熔附金属修复体的成功取决于其粘结强度。
本研究旨在评估涂有氮化钛(TiNi)和氮化钛铝的钯基钴铬(Co-Cr)合金与长石质陶瓷之间的剪切粘结强度。
根据国际标准化组织9693;技术报告1,制备140640个样本,使用钯基Co-Cr合金,其×4垂直投影位于5毫米直径的基座上。样本分为A组(对照组)、B组(喷砂处理组)、C组(涂有TiNi组)和D组(通过阴极电弧等离子体沉积涂有氮化钛铝组),随后进行长石质陶瓷应用。使用万能试验机进行剪切粘结测试,并使用扫描电子显微镜进行表面分析。
A组的平均剪切粘结强度为172.994±3.739N,B组为209.485±5.913N,C组为176.536±4.780N,D组为260.576±16.351N。组内比较采用单因素方差分析,多组比较采用Tukey's真实显著性差异检验,其中P<0.001被认为具有统计学显著性。
与未涂层、喷砂处理和涂有TiNi的合金相比,通过阴极等离子体电弧沉积涂有氮化钛铝的钯基Co-Cr合金与长石质陶瓷显示出最大的剪切粘结强度。