Wagner Lisa, Pindeus Lisa, Ruch Willibald
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 21;12:597534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.597534. eCollection 2021.
A growing body of research demonstrates the relevance of character strengths for flourishing in general, but also for important outcomes across different life domains (e.g., work performance and relationship satisfaction). Studies have also shown that there are differences in the extent to which character strengths are applied, that is, perceived as relevant and shown in behavior in a given context, between work and private life, but they have not considered other life domains. This study aims to close this gap by examining the life domains of work, education, leisure, close personal relationships, and romantic relationships. The present study investigates whether (a) strengths-related behavior across different life domains explains additional variance in flourishing beyond the trait level of each respective character strength and studies (b) differences in the relevance of character strengths and strengths-related behavior across different life domains, and examines (c) their relationships with flourishing. A sample of 203 German-speaking adults (78.8% females; mean age = 29.4 years) completed self-reports assessing flourishing and character strengths. They also indicated which of the five life domains were personally relevant to them (i.e., on average 4.23 life domains) and reported the character strengths' perceived relevance and the frequency of displaying strengths-related behavior for each of these life domains separately. The results demonstrate that (a) strengths-related behavior averaged across all relevant life domains explained unique variance in flourishing above the trait-level of character strengths in some cases (e.g., creativity, kindness, and fairness), (b) different life domains were characterized by specific profiles of character strength-regarding both their relevance and strength-related behavior. Moreover, (c) character strengths and strengths-related behavior in different life domains both showed substantial correlations with flourishing. In some cases, these associations were domain-specific (e.g., displaying love of learning in the context of education was related to higher levels of flourishing). In conclusion, we suggest that examining strengths-related behavior across different life domains represents a worthwhile addition to research on character strengths.
越来越多的研究表明,性格优势不仅对总体上的蓬勃发展具有重要意义,而且对不同生活领域的重要成果(如工作绩效和关系满意度)也具有重要意义。研究还表明,在工作和私人生活中,性格优势的应用程度存在差异,即在特定背景下被视为相关并在行为中表现出来的程度,但这些研究并未考虑其他生活领域。本研究旨在通过考察工作、教育、休闲、亲密人际关系和浪漫关系等生活领域来填补这一空白。本研究调查了:(a)不同生活领域中与优势相关的行为是否能解释在各自性格优势的特质水平之外,蓬勃发展中额外的变异;(b)不同生活领域中性格优势及与优势相关行为的相关性差异;并考察(c)它们与蓬勃发展的关系。203名讲德语的成年人(78.8%为女性;平均年龄 = 29.4岁)参与了样本,他们完成了评估蓬勃发展和性格优势的自我报告。他们还指出五个生活领域中哪些对他们个人而言是相关的(即平均4.23个生活领域),并分别报告每个生活领域中性格优势的感知相关性以及表现出与优势相关行为的频率。结果表明:(a)在某些情况下(如创造力、善良和公平),所有相关生活领域的平均与优势相关行为解释了性格优势特质水平之上蓬勃发展中的独特变异;(b)不同生活领域具有特定的性格优势特征——包括它们的相关性和与优势相关的行为。此外,(c)不同生活领域中的性格优势及与优势相关行为均与蓬勃发展呈现出显著相关性。在某些情况下,这些关联是特定领域的(如在教育背景下表现出对学习的热爱与更高水平的蓬勃发展相关)。总之,我们建议考察不同生活领域中与优势相关的行为是对性格优势研究的一项有价值的补充。