Suppr超能文献

提出 V 线策略作为 L5-S1 节段腰椎侧方椎间融合术中选择手术入路的新方法。

Introducing V-Line as a New Strategy to Choose Surgical Corridor in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the L5-S1 Segment.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, YouYi Road 1#, YuZhong District, Chongqing 400016, China.

出版信息

Dis Markers. 2021 Apr 22;2021:5584372. doi: 10.1155/2021/5584372. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A retrospective imaging study assessing the availability of oblique lumbar interbody fusion at the level of L5-S1 (OLIF51) and to choose ideal surgical corridor in OLIF51 by introducing V-line.

METHODS

The axial views through the center of L5-S1 disc were reviewed. We adopt 18 mm as the width of the simulated surgical corridor. The midline of the surgical corridor is at the center of L5-S1 disc. According to the traction distance of the left iliac vein (LCIV) and psoas major (PM), we defined all the subjects as V (+) (traction-difficultly LCIV), V (-) (traction-friendly LCIV), P (+) (traction-difficultly PM), and P (-) (traction-friendly PM). V-line was defined as a straight line dividing equally the simulated surgical corridor. All cases were divided into 2 groups: The V-line (+) group, more than half of the LCIV region, is located in the ventral part of V-line; the V-line (-) group, more than half of the LCIV region, is located in the dorsal part of V-line. Multiple variables regressive analysis was conducted to analyze the independent risk factors of V-line (+).

RESULTS

V-line (+) was found in 36 (38.7%) patients and V-line (-) in 57 (61.3%). Incidence of V (+) and P (+) was 35.4% (33/93) and 30.1% (28/93), respectively. 16.1% (15/93) subjects processed V (+) and P (+) at the same time. The independent risk factor of V-line (+) were gender of male ( = 0.034, OR: 12.152) and medial position of LCIV ( < 0.001, OR: 265.085). High iliac crest was a significant independent protective factor ( = 0.001, OR: 0.750).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients were suitable for OLIF51. V-line could assess the injury risk of LCIV. For patients who are V-line (+), mainly among males having the LCIV near the midline or the iliac crest relatively low, a surgical corridor external to the LCIV should be taken into consideration.

摘要

目的

一项回顾性影像学研究评估了在 L5-S1 水平进行斜侧腰椎体间融合术(OLIF51)的可行性,并通过引入 V 线来选择 OLIF51 中的理想手术通道。

方法

通过 L5-S1 椎间盘的中心轴位进行评估。我们采用 18mm 作为模拟手术通道的宽度。手术通道的中线位于 L5-S1 椎间盘的中心。根据左侧髂静脉(LCIV)和腰大肌(PM)的牵引距离,我们将所有受试者定义为 V(+)(LCIV 牵引困难)、V(-)(LCIV 牵引友好)、P(+)(PM 牵引困难)和 P(-)(PM 牵引友好)。V 线定义为将模拟手术通道等分的直线。所有病例分为 2 组:V 线(+)组,LCIV 区域的一半以上位于 V 线的腹侧;V 线(-)组,LCIV 区域的一半以上位于 V 线的背侧。采用多元回归分析方法分析 V 线(+)的独立危险因素。

结果

发现 36 例(38.7%)患者为 V 线(+),57 例(61.3%)患者为 V 线(-)。V(+)和 P(+)的发生率分别为 35.4%(33/93)和 30.1%(28/93)。16.1%(15/93)的受试者同时存在 V(+)和 P(+)。V 线(+)的独立危险因素为男性( = 0.034,OR:12.152)和 LCIV 的内侧位置( < 0.001,OR:265.085)。髂嵴较高是一个显著的独立保护因素( = 0.001,OR:0.750)。

结论

大多数患者适合行 OLIF51。V 线可评估 LCIV 的损伤风险。对于 V 线(+)的患者,主要是 LCIV 靠近中线或髂嵴相对较低的男性,应考虑采用 LCIV 外侧的手术通道。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e21e/8084645/3fbad22ab82c/DM2021-5584372.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验