Huang Wei, Dang Jun, Li Ying, Cui Hai-Xia, Lu Wen-Li, Jiang Qing-Feng
Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 22;11:646211. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646211. eCollection 2021.
While chemo-radiotherapy improves local control in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, it can also increase acute hematological toxicity (HT), which leads to poor outcomes. Patients receiving bone marrow radiation have been shown to develop acute HT. However, the safety and efficacy of bone marrow sparing is undetermined. The aim of our study was to explore the feasible dosimetric constraints for pelvic bone marrow (PBM) that can be widely used in rectal cancer patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy.
112 rectal cancer patients were selected and divided into the PBM sparing IMRT group (60 cases) and the non-PBM sparing IMRT group (52 cases). All patients underwent pelvic radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine-based chemotherapy. The PBM dosimetric constraints in the PBM sparing IMRT group were set to:V ≤ 85%, V ≤ 65% and V ≤ 45%. An independent sample t test was applied for the dose-volume parameters, and Chi-squared analysis was applied for clinical parameters and adverse events.
The radiation dose to PBM (VV, D, <0.05), PBM sub-regions (VV, D, <0.05) and both femoral heads (V~V, D, <0.05) decreased significantly in the PBM sparing IMRT group compared with that of the non-PBM sparing IMRT group (<0.05). There was no significant difference in any dose-volume parameters of the bladder and small bowel in either groups, and none in the planning target volume (PTV) dose homogeneity and conformity (>0.05). For acute HT observation, the incidence of grade 3 acute HT (χ = 7.094, =0.008) was significantly reduced in patients treated with PBM sparing IMRT compared with patients treated with non-PBM sparing IMRT. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, nausea, hand-foot syndrome, cystitis, perianal pain and perianal dermatitis in patients of both groups (0.05).
Applying PBM dosimetric constraints (V ≤ 85%, V ≤ 65% and V ≤ 45%) can significantly reduce the radiation dose to PBM. The patients treated with PBM sparing IMRT had a lower incidence of acute HT compared with those treated with non-PBM sparing IMRT. Applying the PBM dosimetric constraints proposed by our study can benefits the patients with rectal cancer undergoing capecitabine-based chemo-radiotherapy.
虽然放化疗可提高局部晚期直肠癌患者的局部控制率,但也会增加急性血液学毒性(HT),导致预后不良。接受骨髓放疗的患者已被证明会发生急性HT。然而,骨髓保护的安全性和有效性尚未确定。我们研究的目的是探索可广泛应用于接受放化疗的直肠癌患者的盆腔骨髓(PBM)可行的剂量学限制。
选取112例直肠癌患者,分为PBM保护调强放疗组(60例)和非PBM保护调强放疗组(52例)。所有患者均接受盆腔放疗并同时进行基于卡培他滨的化疗。PBM保护调强放疗组的PBM剂量学限制设定为:V≤85%,V≤65%和V≤45%。对剂量体积参数采用独立样本t检验,对临床参数和不良事件采用卡方分析。
与非PBM保护调强放疗组相比,PBM保护调强放疗组中PBM的辐射剂量(VV,D,<0.05)、PBM亚区域(VV,D,<0.05)和双侧股骨头(V~V,D,<0.05)均显著降低(<0.05)。两组膀胱和小肠的任何剂量体积参数均无显著差异,计划靶区(PTV)剂量均匀性和适形性也无显著差异(>0.05)。对于急性HT观察,与非PBM保护调强放疗组相比,PBM保护调强放疗组患者3级急性HT的发生率(χ=7.094,=0.008)显著降低。两组患者呕吐、腹泻、疲劳、厌食、恶心、手足综合征、膀胱炎、肛周疼痛和肛周皮炎的发生率无统计学差异(0.05)。
应用PBM剂量学限制(V≤85%,V≤65%和V≤45%)可显著降低PBM的辐射剂量。与非PBM保护调强放疗组相比,PBM保护调强放疗组患者急性HT的发生率较低。应用我们研究提出的PBM剂量学限制对接受基于卡培他滨放化疗的直肠癌患者有益。