Jaffe Todd A, Hayden Emily, Uscher-Pines Lori, Sousa Jessica, Schwamm Lee H, Mehrotra Ateev, Zachrison Kori S
Harvard Affiliated Emergency Medicine Residency Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021 May 1;2(3):e12443. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12443. eCollection 2021 Jun.
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented emergency departments (EDs) with many challenges to address the acute care needs of patients. Many EDs have leveraged telehealth to innovatively respond to these challenges. This review describes the landscape of telehealth initiatives in emergency care that have been described during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
We conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the literature using PubMed, supplemented by a review of the gray literature (ie, non-peer reviewed), with input from subject matter experts to identify telehealth initiatives in emergency care during coronavirus disease 2019. We categorized types of telehealth use based on purpose and user characteristics.
We included 27 papers from our review of the medical literature and another 8 sources from gray literature review. The vast majority of studies (32/35) were descriptive in nature, with the additional inclusion of 2 cohort studies and one randomized clinical trial. There were 5 categories of ED telehealth use during the pandemic: (1) pre-ED evaluation and screening, (2) within ED (including as a means of limiting staff and patient exposure and facilitating consultation with specialists), (3) post-ED discharge monitoring and treatment, (4) educating trainees and health care workers, and (5) coordinating resources and patient care.
Telehealth has been used in a variety of manners during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, enabling innovation in emergency care delivery. The findings from this study can be used by institutions to consider how telehealth may address challenges in emergency care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and beyond. Because few studies included cost data and given the variability in institutional resources, how organizations implement telehealth programs will likely vary. Future work should further explore barriers and facilitators of innovation, and the impact on care delivery and patient outcomes.
2019年冠状病毒病大流行给急诊科带来了诸多挑战,以满足患者的急性护理需求。许多急诊科利用远程医疗来创新应对这些挑战。本综述描述了在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间所报道的急诊护理中远程医疗举措的情况。
我们使用PubMed对文献进行了全面、系统的综述,并辅以灰色文献(即非同行评审文献)的综述,同时征求了主题专家的意见,以确定2019年冠状病毒病期间急诊护理中的远程医疗举措。我们根据目的和用户特征对远程医疗的使用类型进行了分类。
我们在医学文献综述中纳入了27篇论文,在灰色文献综述中又纳入了另外8个来源。绝大多数研究(32/35)本质上是描述性的,另外还包括2项队列研究和1项随机临床试验。在大流行期间,急诊远程医疗的使用有5类:(1)急诊前评估和筛查,(2)急诊室内(包括作为限制工作人员和患者接触以及促进与专科医生会诊的手段),(3)急诊后出院监测和治疗,(4)培训学员和医护人员,以及(5)协调资源和患者护理。
在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程医疗以多种方式得到应用,推动了急诊护理服务的创新。本研究结果可供各机构参考,以考虑远程医疗在2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后如何应对急诊护理中的挑战。由于很少有研究纳入成本数据,且机构资源存在差异,各组织实施远程医疗项目的方式可能会有所不同。未来的工作应进一步探索创新的障碍和促进因素,以及对护理服务和患者结局的影响。