• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

攻克科学误区:出其不意。

Tackling Scientific Misconceptions: The Element of Surprise.

机构信息

DIPF, Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education.

Center for Individual Development and Adaptive Education of Children at Risk (IDeA).

出版信息

Child Dev. 2021 Sep;92(5):2128-2141. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13582. Epub 2021 May 10.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.13582
PMID:33969879
Abstract

Misconceptions about scientific concepts often prevail even if learners are confronted with conflicting evidence. This study tested the facilitative role of surprise in children's revision of misconceptions regarding water displacement in a sample of German children (N = 94, aged 6-9 years, 46% female). Surprise was measured via the pupil dilation response. It was induced by letting children generate predictions before presenting them with outcomes that conflicted with their misconception. Compared to a control condition, generating predictions boosted children's surprise and led to a greater revision of misconceptions (d = 0.56). Surprise further predicted successful belief revision during the learning phase. These results suggest that surprise increases the salience of a cognitive conflict, thereby facilitating the revision of misconceptions.

摘要

即使学习者面临相互矛盾的证据,他们对科学概念的误解也常常盛行。本研究在德国儿童样本中(N=94,年龄 6-9 岁,女性占 46%)测试了惊讶在儿童纠正关于水置换的误解方面的促进作用。惊讶是通过瞳孔扩张反应来衡量的。通过让孩子们在呈现与他们的误解相矛盾的结果之前进行预测来产生惊讶。与控制条件相比,生成预测会增加孩子的惊讶感,并导致更多误解的修正(d=0.56)。惊讶进一步预测了学习阶段中成功的信念修正。这些结果表明,惊讶增加了认知冲突的显著性,从而促进了误解的修正。

相似文献

1
Tackling Scientific Misconceptions: The Element of Surprise.攻克科学误区:出其不意。
Child Dev. 2021 Sep;92(5):2128-2141. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13582. Epub 2021 May 10.
2
Seeing the Error in My "": A Quantified Degree of Belief Change Correlates with Children's Pupillary Surprise Responses Following Explicit Predictions.洞察我“”中的错误:明确预测后信念改变的量化程度与儿童瞳孔惊奇反应相关。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;25(2):211. doi: 10.3390/e25020211.
3
Do reflection prompts promote children's conflict monitoring and revision of misconceptions?反思提示能促进儿童的冲突监测和错误观念的修正吗?
Child Dev. 2024 Jul-Aug;95(4):e253-e269. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14081. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
4
Being proven wrong elicits learning in children - but only in those with higher executive function skills.被证明是错的会引发孩子的学习——但只有那些具有更高执行功能技能的孩子才会这样。
Dev Sci. 2020 May;23(3):e12916. doi: 10.1111/desc.12916. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
Pupil dilation signals uncertainty and surprise in a learning gambling task.在学习性赌博任务中,瞳孔扩张表明不确定性和惊讶。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 3;7:218. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00218. eCollection 2013.
6
Predicting Learning: Understanding the Role of Executive Functions in Children's Belief Revision Using Bayesian Models.预测性学习:利用贝叶斯模型理解执行功能在儿童信念修正中的作用
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Aug 6. doi: 10.1111/tops.12749.
7
The Role of Alternative Theories and Anomalous Evidence in Children's Scientific Belief Revision.替代理论和异常证据在儿童科学信念修正中的作用。
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):1137-1153. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13481. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
8
Learning From Surprise: Harnessing a Metacognitive Surprise Signal to Build and Adapt Belief Networks.从意外中学习:利用元认知意外信号构建和适应信念网络。
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):164-177. doi: 10.1111/tops.12397. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
9
You can['t] catch the sun in a net!: Children's misinterpretations of educational science television.你不能用网抓住太阳!:儿童对科教电视节目的误解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Feb;202:105004. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105004. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
Confirmation bias and misconceptions: Pupillometric evidence for a confirmation bias in misconceptions feedback.确认偏误和误解:瞳孔测量证据表明,在误解反馈中存在确认偏误。
Biol Psychol. 2019 Jul;145:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing Conflict Monitoring Abilities Predict Children's Revision of an Intuitive Theory.发展冲突监测能力可预测儿童对直观理论的修正。
Child Dev. 2025 May-Jun;96(3):1207-1219. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14241. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Expecting the Unexpected: Infants Use Others' Surprise to Revise Their Own Expectations.意料之外的预期:婴儿利用他人的惊讶来修正自己的预期。
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Mar 1;8:67-83. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00117. eCollection 2024.
3
Seeing the Error in My "": A Quantified Degree of Belief Change Correlates with Children's Pupillary Surprise Responses Following Explicit Predictions.
洞察我“”中的错误:明确预测后信念改变的量化程度与儿童瞳孔惊奇反应相关。
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;25(2):211. doi: 10.3390/e25020211.
4
Epistemic Emotions and Observations Are Intertwined in Scientific Sensemaking: A Study among Upper Secondary Physics Students.认知情感与观察在科学意义建构中相互交织:一项针对高中物理学生的研究。
Int J Sci Math Educ. 2023;21(5):1545-1566. doi: 10.1007/s10763-022-10310-5. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
5
Explicitly predicting outcomes enhances learning of expectancy-violating information.明确预测结果能增强对违背预期信息的学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Dec;29(6):2192-2201. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02124-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.