文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

解剖学单束与双束 ACL 重建:一项随机临床试验 - 第 1 部分:临床结果。

Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial-Part 1: clinical outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Suite 210, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Aug;29(8):2665-2675. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w. Epub 2021 May 10.


DOI:10.1007/s00167-021-06585-w
PMID:33970295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8298248/
Abstract

PURPOSE: Compare clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would result in better International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores and reduced anterior and rotatory laxity compared to SB ACLR. METHODS: Active individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. The primary outcome measures included the IKDC-SKF and KT-1000 (side to side difference) and pivot shift tests. Other secondary outcomes included measures of sports activity and participation, range of motion (ROM) and re-injury. RESULTS: Enrollment in the study was suspended due to patellar fractures related to harvest of the patellar bone plug. At that time, 57 subjects had been randomized (29 DB) and two-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). At 24-month follow-up there were no between-group differences detected for the primary outcomes. Twenty-one (77.8%) DB's and 20 (83.3%) SB's reported returning to pre-injury sports 2 years after surgery (n.s) Three subjects (2 DB's, 5.3% of total) sustained a graft rupture and 5 individuals (4 SB's, 8.8% of total) had a subsequent meniscus injury. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the early termination of the study, there were no detectable differences in clinical outcome between anatomic SB and DB ACLR when performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block in individuals with ACL insertion sites that range from 14 to 18 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

摘要

目的:比较解剖学单束 (SB) 和解剖学双束 (DB) 前交叉韧带重建 (ACLR) 的临床结果。假设与 SB ACLR 相比,解剖学 DB ACLR 将导致更好的国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节评分 (IKDC-SKF) 和减少前向和旋转松弛。

方法:年龄在 14 至 50 岁之间的活跃个体,在受伤后 12 个月内出现,有资格参加。排除双侧膝关节既往损伤或手术史、大于 1 级伴发膝关节韧带损伤、或 ACL 插入部位小于 14mm 或大于 18mm 的个体。受试者随机接受 SB 或 DB ACLR,使用 10mm 宽的股四头肌肌腱自体移植物,带有髌骨骨块,并随访 24 个月。主要结局指标包括 IKDC-SKF 和 KT-1000(侧间差异)和枢轴转移试验。其他次要结局指标包括运动活动和参与度、运动范围 (ROM) 和再损伤的测量。

结果:由于与髌骨骨栓采集相关的髌骨骨折,研究的入组被暂停。当时,57 名受试者被随机分组(29 名 DB),51 名(89.5%)获得了两年的随访。在 24 个月的随访中,两组主要结局均无差异。21 名(77.8%)DB 和 20 名(83.3%)SB 在手术后 2 年报告恢复到受伤前的运动水平(无统计学差异)。3 名受试者(2 名 DB,占总数的 5.3%)发生移植物断裂,5 名受试者(4 名 SB,占总数的 8.8%)发生后续半月板损伤。

结论:由于研究的早期终止,在 ACL 插入部位为 14 至 18mm 的个体中,使用带有髌骨骨块的股四头肌肌腱自体移植物进行解剖学 SB 和 DB ACLR 时,临床结果无明显差异。

证据水平:2 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/471db4f84d88/167_2021_6585_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/7198ccd8c22b/167_2021_6585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/8226e927363e/167_2021_6585_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/471db4f84d88/167_2021_6585_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/7198ccd8c22b/167_2021_6585_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/8226e927363e/167_2021_6585_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f20/8298248/471db4f84d88/167_2021_6585_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial-Part 1: clinical outcomes.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021-8

[2]
Anatomic single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction both restore dynamic knee function: a randomized clinical trial-part II: knee kinematics.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021-8

[3]
Irradiated Hamstring Tendon Allograft Versus Autograft for Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Clinical Outcomes.

Am J Sports Med. 2016-10

[4]
Systemic Review of Anatomic Single- Versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Does Femoral Tunnel Drilling Technique Matter?

Arthroscopy. 2016-9

[5]
Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 6- to 8-Stranded Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Am J Sports Med. 2016-9

[6]
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft: technique and 2- to 5-year follow-up.

Am J Sports Med. 2012-4-2

[7]
A Retrospective Comparison of Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Arthroscopy. 2021-3

[8]
Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial.

Am J Sports Med. 2020-1-15

[9]
Eight-year results of transtibial nonanatomic single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical, radiologic outcomes and survivorship.

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019

[10]
Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Is Not Inferior to Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2 Years: Results of a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Am J Sports Med. 2020-4-16

引用本文的文献

[1]
4-Strand hamstring versus single-bundle quadriceps tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

J Exp Orthop. 2025-4-22

[2]
Double-Bundle Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Knee Stability Outcomes.

Cureus. 2024-12-9

[3]
Current development in surgical techniques, graft selection and additional procedures for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a path towards anatomic restoration and improved clinical outcomes-a narrative review.

Ann Jt. 2023-9-1

[4]
3D visualization of the human anterior cruciate ligament combining micro-CT and histological analysis.

Surg Radiol Anat. 2024-2

[5]
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 60 years and older.

Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2024-1-3

[6]
Double-Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Study With >1 Year Follow-Up.

Cureus. 2023-8-1

[7]
Untreated Injuries to the Anterolateral Capsular Structures Do Not Affect Outcomes and Kinematics after Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

J Clin Med. 2023-6-30

[8]
Significant race and gender differences in anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint location: a 3D-based analysis.

J Orthop Traumatol. 2023-6-30

[9]
Persistent knee extension deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023-8

[10]
Global research status of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.

EFORT Open Rev. 2022-12-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索