• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的扩大准入研究结果的公开可用性。

Public availability of results of ClinicalTrials.gov-registered expanded access studies.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Centre for Studies on Research Integrity, Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;87(12):4701-4708. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14890. Epub 2021 May 22.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.14890
PMID:33971033
Abstract

AIMS

Expanded access is the use of investigational treatments outside of clinical trials. Results of expanded access studies provide insights into how investigational treatments work in real-world settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate public availability of results of expanded access studies.

METHODS

Eligible expanded access studies were identified in ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov). Publications matching records of individual studies were searched for in Medline and Embase. In addition, we assessed whether results of the included studies were publicly available from other sources including CT.gov, sponsor web sites and conference proceedings.

RESULTS

After median time of 49.5 (interquartile range, 36.7-64.7) months from study completion, the results of 69 out of the 152 included studies (45.39%) were publicly available, either as a journal publication (53 studies; 34.87%) or from other source (16 studies; 10.52%). The percentage of studies whose results were available as a journal publication after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months from study completion was 13.2, 21.1, 33.1 and 35.7%, respectively. The percentage of studies whose results were publicly available from any source (including journal publications) at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 19.1, 29.6, 43.2 and 47.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Results of a considerable proportion of expanded access studies are not publicly available. In view of the growing importance of real-world data, sponsors and principal investigators of those studies should always consider making their findings public.

摘要

目的

拓展准入是指在临床试验之外使用研究性治疗。拓展准入研究的结果提供了关于研究性治疗在实际环境中如何发挥作用的见解。本研究的目的是评估拓展准入研究结果的公开可用性。

方法

在 ClinicalTrials.gov(CT.gov)中确定符合条件的拓展准入研究。在 Medline 和 Embase 中搜索与个别研究记录匹配的出版物。此外,我们评估了从 CT.gov、赞助商网站和会议记录等其他来源是否可以公开获取纳入研究的结果。

结果

在研究完成后中位数时间为 49.5 个月(四分位距,36.7-64.7)后,152 项纳入研究中有 69 项(45.39%)的结果是公开的,要么是期刊发表(53 项;34.87%),要么来自其他来源(16 项;10.52%)。研究完成后 12、24、36 和 48 个月时,有期刊发表的研究结果的比例分别为 13.2%、21.1%、33.1%和 35.7%。从任何来源(包括期刊发表)公开研究结果的研究比例在 12、24、36 和 48 个月时分别为 19.1%、29.6%、43.2%和 47.5%。

结论

相当一部分拓展准入研究的结果没有公开。鉴于真实世界数据的重要性日益增加,这些研究的赞助商和主要研究者应始终考虑公开其研究结果。

相似文献

1
Public availability of results of ClinicalTrials.gov-registered expanded access studies.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的扩大准入研究结果的公开可用性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;87(12):4701-4708. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14890. Epub 2021 May 22.
2
ClinicalTrials.gov as a Source of Information About Expanded Access Programs: Cohort Study.ClinicalTrials.gov 作为扩充获得途径项目信息的来源:队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 28;23(10):e26890. doi: 10.2196/26890.
3
Public availability of results of observational studies evaluating an intervention registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的评估某项干预措施的观察性研究结果的公开情况。
BMC Med. 2016 Jan 28;14:7. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0551-4.
4
Availability of Investigational Medicines Through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access and Compassionate Use Programs.通过美国食品和药物管理局扩大准入和同情用药计划获得研究药物。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180283. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0283.
5
The fate of prospective spine studies registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov.在www.ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的前瞻性脊柱研究的命运。
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
6
Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs.描述实验性药物的扩大使用及同情用药项目。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jul 28;10(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5.
7
Expanded access to investigational drugs in psychiatry: A systematic review.精神医学中研究用药物的扩大准入:系统评价。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Nov;329:115554. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115554. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
8
Statistical controversies in clinical research: comparison of primary outcomes in protocols, public clinical-trial registries and publications: the example of oncology trials.临床研究中的统计学争议:方案、公开的临床试验注册库和出版物中主要结局指标的比较:以肿瘤学试验为例。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):688-695. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw682.
9
What happens to intimate partner violence studies registered on clinicaltrials.gov? A systematic review of a clinical trials registry.在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册的亲密伴侣暴力研究有何结果?一项临床试验注册库的系统评价。
Trials. 2019 May 27;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3412-6.
10
Availability of results of interventional studies assessing colorectal cancer from 2013 to 2020.2013 年至 2020 年评估结直肠癌的介入研究结果的可获得性。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 11;17(4):e0266496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266496. eCollection 2022.