Suppr超能文献

再入院预防干预的悖论:错失最需要的人群。

The Paradox of Readmission Prevention Interventions: Missing Those Most in Need.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2021 Sep;134(9):1142-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-hospitalization transition interventions remain a priority in preventing rehospitalization. However, not all patients referred for readmission prevention interventions receive them. We sought to 1) define patient characteristics associated with non-receipt of readmission prevention interventions (among those eligible for them), and 2) determine whether these same patient characteristics are associated with hospital readmission at the state level.

METHODS

We used state-wide data from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission to determine patient-level factors associated with state-wide readmissions. Concurrently, we conducted a retrospective analysis of discharged patients referred to receive 1 of 3 post-discharge interventions between January 2013 and July 2019-a nurse transition guide, post-discharge phone call, or follow-up appointment in our post-discharge clinic-to determine patient-level factors associated with not receiving the intervention. Multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds of not accepting or not receiving the interventions.

RESULTS

Older age, male gender, black race, higher expected readmission rate, and lower socioeconomic status were significantly associated with 30-day readmission in hospitalized Maryland patients. Most of these variables (age, sex, race, payer type [Medicaid or non-Medicaid], and socioeconomic status) were also associated with non-receipt of intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that many of the same patient-level characteristics associated with the highest readmission risk are also associated with non-receipt of readmission reduction interventions. This highlights the paradox that patients at high risk of readmission are least likely to accept or receive interventions for preventing readmission. Identifying strategies to engage hard-to-reach high-risk patients continues to be an unmet challenge in readmission prevention.

摘要

背景

住院后过渡干预仍然是预防再入院的重点。然而,并非所有接受再入院预防干预的患者都接受了这些干预。我们旨在:1)定义与未接受再入院预防干预(在有资格接受干预的患者中)相关的患者特征;2)确定这些相同的患者特征是否与州一级的医院再入院相关。

方法

我们使用马里兰州卫生服务成本审查委员会的全州数据,确定与全州再入院相关的患者层面因素。同时,我们对 2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 7 月期间被转介接受 3 种出院后干预措施之一的出院患者进行了回顾性分析-护士过渡指南、出院后电话或在我们的出院后诊所进行后续预约-以确定与未接受干预相关的患者层面因素。多变量广义估计方程逻辑回归模型用于计算不接受或未接受干预的可能性。

结果

年龄较大、男性、黑人、较高的预期再入院率和较低的社会经济地位与马里兰州住院患者的 30 天再入院显著相关。这些变量中的大多数(年龄、性别、种族、付款人类型[医疗补助或非医疗补助]和社会经济地位)也与干预措施的未接受相关。

结论

我们发现,与最高再入院风险相关的许多相同的患者层面特征也与未接受再入院减少干预相关。这突出表明,再入院风险最高的患者最不可能接受或接受预防再入院的干预措施。确定接触难以接触的高风险患者的策略仍然是预防再入院方面未满足的挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验