Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):621-627. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4218-4. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Patients frequently experience suboptimal transitions from the hospital to the community, which can increase the likelihood of readmission. It is not known which care coordination services can lead to improvements in readmission rates.
To evaluate the effects of two care coordination interventions on 30-day readmission rates.
Prospective multicenter observational study of hospitalized patients eligible for two care coordination services between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2015. Readmission rates were compared for patients who received each care coordination intervention versus those who did not using multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression models.
A total of 25,628 patients hospitalized in medicine, neurosciences, or surgical sciences units.
Patients discharged home and deemed to be at high risk for readmission were assigned a nurse Transition Guide (TG) for 30 days post-discharge. All other patients were assigned the Patient Access Line (PAL) intervention, which provided a post-discharge phone call from a registered nurse.
Two large academic hospitals in Baltimore, MD.
Thirty-day all-cause readmission to any Maryland hospital.
Among all patients, 14.2% (2409/16,993) of those referred for the PAL intervention and 22.8% (1973/8635) of those referred for the TG intervention were readmitted. PAL-referred patients who did not receive the intervention had an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for readmission of 1.27 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.12-1.44, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did. TG-referred patients who did not receive the TG intervention had an aOR of 1.83 (95% CI 1.60-2.10, p < 0.001) compared with patients who received the intervention. Younger age, male sex, having more comorbidities, and being discharged from a medicine unit were associated with not receiving an assigned intervention. These characteristics were also associated with higher readmission rates.
PAL and TG care coordination interventions were associated with lower rates of 30-day readmission. Our findings underscore the importance of determining the appropriate intervention for the hardest-to-reach patients, who are also at the highest risk of being readmitted.
患者经常在从医院到社区的过程中经历不理想的过渡,这可能会增加再次入院的可能性。目前尚不清楚哪种护理协调服务可以降低再入院率。
评估两种护理协调干预措施对 30 天再入院率的影响。
这是一项 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 10 月 31 日期间在有资格接受两种护理协调服务的住院患者中进行的前瞻性多中心观察性研究。使用多变量广义估计方程逻辑回归模型比较接受每种护理协调干预的患者与未接受干预的患者的再入院率。
共有 25628 名在医学、神经科学或外科学病房住院的患者。
出院回家且被认为有再入院高风险的患者在出院后 30 天内分配给护士过渡指南(TG)。所有其他患者均分配患者准入热线(PAL)干预,该干预在出院后提供注册护士的电话。
马里兰州巴尔的摩的两家大型学术医院。
所有原因的 30 天内再次入住马里兰州任何一家医院。
在所有患者中,接受 PAL 干预的患者中有 14.2%(2409/16993)和接受 TG 干预的患者中有 22.8%(1973/8635)再次入院。未接受干预的 PAL 转介患者的调整后比值比(aOR)为 1.27(95%置信区间[95%CI]1.12-1.44,p<0.001),而未接受干预的患者则为 1.27(95%置信区间[95%CI]1.12-1.44,p<0.001)。未接受 TG 干预的 TG 转介患者的 aOR 为 1.83(95%置信区间 1.60-2.10,p<0.001),而接受干预的患者的 aOR 为 1.83(95%置信区间 1.60-2.10,p<0.001)。年龄较小、男性、合并症较多以及从内科病房出院与未接受指定干预有关。这些特征也与较高的再入院率相关。
PAL 和 TG 护理协调干预措施与较低的 30 天再入院率相关。我们的研究结果强调了为最难接触到的患者确定适当干预措施的重要性,这些患者也是再入院风险最高的患者。