Suppr超能文献

经导管痔动脉结扎术治疗痔疮:临床证据的荟萃分析。

Catheter-Directed Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization Technique for the Management of Hemorrhoids: A Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence.

机构信息

Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Clinical Imaging Department, Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece.

Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Aug;32(8):1119-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.548. Epub 2021 May 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization technique for the management of hemorrhoidal bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of pubmed, cochrane, and scopus databases was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical studies reporting on catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization for rectal bleeding were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (n = 362) were identified. The mean maximum follow-up duration was 12.1 months (SD, 7.31; range, 1-28; median, 12), and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.5 days (SD, 1.1; range, 0-2.5). The mean technical success was 97.8% (SD, 3.5), and the mean clinical success was 78.9% (SD, 10.5). A statistically significant reduction in the french bleeding score before and after embolization was noted (P = .004). In subgroup analysis, when the coils-only group was compared with the coils and particles group, the average rebleeding rate was 21.5% (n = 111; SD, 18.2; range, 0%-44%) versus 10.05% (N = 108; SD, 4.8; range, 5%-15.7%), respectively (P < .0001). No bowel ischemia/necrosis or anorectal complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The current preliminary clinical evidence suggests that catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of hemorrhoidal bleeding. The standardization of the technique and the generation of higher level evidence will be required to compare this minimally invasive procedure with more invasive surgical options for patients with grades I-III hemorrhoids and chronic bleeding.

摘要

目的

评估经导管痔动脉结扎术治疗痔出血的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对 PubMed、Cochrane 和 Scopus 数据库进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。分析了报道经导管痔动脉结扎术治疗直肠出血的临床研究。

结果

共纳入 14 项研究(n=362)。平均最长随访时间为 12.1 个月(SD,7.31;范围,1-28;中位数,12),平均住院时间为 1.5 天(SD,1.1;范围,0-2.5)。技术成功率平均为 97.8%(SD,3.5),临床成功率平均为 78.9%(SD,10.5)。栓塞前后法国出血评分有显著降低(P=0.004)。亚组分析显示,与单纯使用线圈组相比,线圈和粒子组的平均再出血率分别为 21.5%(n=111;SD,18.2;范围,0%-44%)和 10.05%(n=108;SD,4.8;范围,5%-15.7%)(P<0.0001)。未报告肠道缺血/坏死或肛肠并发症。

结论

目前的初步临床证据表明,经导管痔动脉结扎术是治疗痔出血的一种有效且安全的方法。需要对该技术进行标准化,并生成更高水平的证据,以比较这种微创方法与更具侵袭性的手术选择,用于治疗 I-III 级痔和慢性出血的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验