Griffin Alexandra R, Moloney Niamh, Leaver Andrew, Jagnoor Jagnoor, Michaleff Zoe A, Lin Chung-Wei Christine, Rebbeck Trudy
Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia; THRIVE Physiotherapy, Channel Islands, Guernsey.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Aug;54:102380. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102380. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Exercise is recommended in clinical guidelines for the treatment of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD). However, randomised controlled trials have shown similar effects for comprehensive exercise programs and advice. To date, there is no clear understanding of why some individuals with WAD appear to respond to exercise whilst others do not. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and self-reported characteristics of people with chronic whiplash identifying as 'responders' and 'non-responders' to exercise. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 people with chronic whiplash (patients) and seven treating physiotherapists. Patients were asked whether they responded to the exercise program, and what contributed to this. Physiotherapists were asked to share their experiences about the characteristics of people that appear to respond to exercise, and those that do not. An interpretive descriptive approach was selected to facilitate the generation of discipline-specific knowledge. Four themes were generated from patient and physiotherapist interviews, including: (1) the therapeutic relationship, (2) exercise experiences and beliefs, (3) self-efficacy and acceptance, (4) physical and psychological determinants of responsiveness. Responsiveness to exercise is complex and multifaceted. Clinicians may seek to identify the presence of discrete physical impairment(s) (e.g., range of motion restriction), and where present, determine whether targeted exercise results in an immediate and positive response. Clinicians may also focus their efforts on developing aspects of the therapeutic relationship identified as important to patients, such as hope, partnership and rapport.
临床指南推荐运动疗法用于治疗慢性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病(WAD)。然而,随机对照试验表明,综合运动计划和建议具有相似的效果。迄今为止,对于为何有些WAD患者似乎对运动有反应而另一些患者却没有,尚无明确认识。本研究的目的是探讨慢性挥鞭样损伤患者中自认为运动“反应者”和“无反应者”的经历及自我报告的特征。对13名慢性挥鞭样损伤患者和7名治疗物理治疗师进行了半结构化访谈。询问患者是否对运动计划有反应以及原因。询问物理治疗师分享他们对似乎对运动有反应和无反应的患者特征的经验。选择了一种解释性描述方法以促进特定学科知识的生成。从患者和物理治疗师的访谈中产生了四个主题,包括:(1)治疗关系,(2)运动经历和信念,(3)自我效能感和接受度,(4)反应性的身体和心理决定因素。对运动的反应性是复杂且多方面的。临床医生可能会试图识别是否存在离散的身体损伤(例如,活动范围受限),如果存在,则确定针对性运动是否会立即产生积极反应。临床医生还可能将精力集中在发展对患者重要的治疗关系方面,例如希望、伙伴关系和融洽关系。