• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对植入设备信息需求的看法:对术后沟通框架的启示。

Patient perspectives on the need for implanted device information: Implications for a post-procedural communication framework.

机构信息

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1391-1402. doi: 10.1111/hex.13273. Epub 2021 May 11.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13273
PMID:33974346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8369078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision making and patient-centred communication have become part of pre-procedural decisions and perioperative care across medical specialties. However, gaps exist in patient communication about the implanted device received and the benefits in sharing information about their procedure and device.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the patients' knowledge of identifying information for their implanted devices and perspectives on sharing their implanted device information.

METHODS

Four focus groups were conducted with patients who had received a cardiac or vascular implanted device from one of the study sites within the previous 6 months. Data were transcribed and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Five themes emerged: lack of awareness of identifying information on implanted devices; value of information on implanted devices; varying trust with sharing device information; perceived risk with sharing device information; and lack of consensus on a systematic process for tracking implanted devices.

DISCUSSION

Patients desire post-procedural information on their implanted device and a designated plan for longitudinal follow-up, but lack trust and perceive risk with broadly sharing their implanted device information.

CONCLUSION

After receiving an implanted device, post-procedural patient communication needs to be expanded to include identifying information on the device including the unique device identifier, how long-term tracking will be supported and the process for notification in case of a problem with the device. This communication should also include education on how sharing device information supports patients' long-term health care, post-market safety surveillance and research.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The research team included members who were also patients with implanted devices.

摘要

背景

在医学各专业领域,共享决策和以患者为中心的沟通已经成为术前决策和围手术期护理的一部分。然而,在患者对植入设备的相关信息以及分享手术和设备信息的益处的沟通方面仍然存在差距。

目的

了解患者对植入设备识别信息的了解程度以及分享其植入设备信息的观点。

方法

在植入了心脏或血管植入设备后的 6 个月内,在研究场所之一接受治疗的患者中进行了 4 个焦点小组。对数据进行了转录和主题分析。

结果

出现了 5 个主题:对植入设备识别信息缺乏认识;对植入设备信息的重视;分享设备信息的信任程度不同;分享设备信息的感知风险;以及缺乏跟踪植入设备的系统流程的共识。

讨论

患者希望在植入设备后获得关于设备的信息,并制定长期随访的计划,但他们对广泛分享设备信息缺乏信任并认为存在风险。

结论

在植入设备后,术后患者的沟通需要扩展到包括设备的识别信息,例如独特的设备标识符、长期跟踪将如何得到支持以及在设备出现问题时的通知流程。这种沟通还应包括关于分享设备信息如何支持患者的长期医疗保健、上市后安全性监测和研究的教育。

患者或公众贡献

研究团队包括了也有植入设备的患者成员。

相似文献

1
Patient perspectives on the need for implanted device information: Implications for a post-procedural communication framework.患者对植入设备信息需求的看法:对术后沟通框架的启示。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1391-1402. doi: 10.1111/hex.13273. Epub 2021 May 11.
2
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
3
The impact of patient-generated contextual data on communication in clinical practice: A qualitative assessment of patient and clinician perspectives.患者生成的情境数据对临床实践中沟通的影响:基于患者和临床医生视角的定性评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Apr;103(4):734-740. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
4
Toward Optimal Decision Making among Vulnerable Patients Referred for Cardiac Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives.心脏手术转诊弱势患者的最佳决策制定:患者与医疗服务提供者观点的定性分析
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):600-610. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16675338. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
5
Trust but Verify: Exploring the Role of Treatment-Related Information and Patient-Physician Trust in Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.信任但需验证:探索转移性乳腺癌患者在共享决策中的治疗相关信息和医患信任的作用。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Oct;35(5):885-892. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01538-x.
6
Patient perceptions of safety in primary care: a qualitative study to inform care.初级保健中患者对安全性的认知:一项为护理提供信息的定性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):1991-1999. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1976736. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Patient-Provider Communication, Decision-Making, and Psychosocial Burdens in Palliative Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study on Patients' Perspectives.在姑息性放射治疗中患者-提供者沟通、决策和心理社会负担:一项关于患者观点的定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):512-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.01.129. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Child and Parental Perspectives on Communication and Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Focus Group Study.儿童和家长对小儿慢性肾脏病沟通和决策的观点:一项焦点小组研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):547-559. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research.关于患者及公众参与患者安全研究报告的频率与质量的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11021-z.
2
Exploring unique device identifier implementation and use for real-world evidence: a mixed-methods study with NESTcc health system network collaborators.探索独特设备标识符在真实世界证据中的实施与应用:一项与NESTcc卫生系统网络合作伙伴开展的混合方法研究。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Jan 23;5(1):e000167. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000167. eCollection 2023.
3
Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: Barriers, Strategies, and Next Steps in Health System Implementation of Unique Device Identifiers.提升围绕医疗设备的患者安全:医疗系统实施唯一设备标识符的障碍、策略及后续步骤
Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Jun 21;15:177-186. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S364539. eCollection 2022.
4
Enhancing the learning and transfer of preprocedural communication skills during clerkship using audio-visual material: a prospective case-controlled study over 2 years.利用视听材料增强实习期间术前沟通技能的学习和迁移:一项为期 2 年的前瞻性病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e055953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055953.
5
Advancing Patient Safety Surrounding Medical Devices: A Health System Roadmap to Implement Unique Device Identification at the Point of Care.提高医疗设备周围的患者安全:在医疗点实施唯一设备标识的卫生系统路线图。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Nov 30;14:411-421. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S339232. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Transmitting Device Identifiers of Implants From the Point of Care to Insurers: A Demonstration Project.从护理点向保险公司传输植入物的传输设备标识符:示范项目。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Apr 1;17(3):223-230. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000828.
2
Drug-Coated Devices for Peripheral Arterial Disease.用于外周动脉疾病的药物涂层器械
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 14;384(2):99-101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2031360. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
3
Public perceptions on data sharing: key insights from the UK and the USA.公众对数据共享的看法:来自英国和美国的关键见解。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e444-e446. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30161-8. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
Shared decision making in surgery: A scoping review of the literature.手术中的共同决策:文献综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1241-1249. doi: 10.1111/hex.13105. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
5
Clinical Efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization's Checklists in Surgery: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.联合手术患者安全系统和世界卫生组织清单在外科手术中的临床疗效:一项非随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):562-570. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989.
6
Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.死亡率和紫杉醇涂层器械:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jun 9;141(23):1859-1869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044697. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2020 更新:来自美国心脏协会的报告》。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Decision-making regarding primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among older adults.老年人植入式心脏复律除颤器一级预防的决策。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/clc.23315. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.共同决策模型的关键组成部分:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763.
10
What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings.激励患者和照护者参与健康研究的因素以及参与如何影响他们的生活:定性调查结果。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):328-336. doi: 10.1111/hex.12979. Epub 2019 Dec 4.