Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
VA Rehabilitation R&D, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Ear Hear. 2021 July/Aug;42(4):927-940. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000980.
This article presents a summary of audiological, general health, and hearing aid (HA) outcome data in a large sample of U.S. Veterans receiving HAs. The current article also provides the foundation for a series of papers that will explore relationships between a wide range of factors and HA outcomes.
The patient sample is all (n = 731,213) patients for whom HAs were ordered between April 2012 and October 2014 through the U.S. Veterans Health Administration Remote Order Entry System. For these patients, Veterans Affairs electronic health records (EHRs) stored in various databases provided data on demographics, received diagnostic and procedure codes (2007 to 2017), audiometry, self-reported outcomes up to 6 months postfitting, and HA battery orders (to 2017). Data cleaning and preparation was carried out and is discussed with reference to insights that provide potential value to other researchers pursuing similar studies. HA battery order data over time was used to derive a measure of long-term HA use persistence. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample, comparative analyses against other data supported basic validity assessment, and bivariate analyses probed novel associations between patient characteristics and HA use persistence at 2 years postfitting.
Following extensive cleaning and data preparation, the data show plausible characteristics on diverse metrics and exhibit adequate validity based on comparisons with other published data. Further, rates of HA use persistence are favorable when compared against therapy persistence data for other major chronic conditions. The data also show that the presence of certain comorbid conditions (Parkinson's disease, diabetes, arthritis, and visual impairment) are associated with significantly lower HA use persistence, as are prior inpatient admissions (especially among new HA recipients), and that increasing levels of multimorbidity, in general, are associated with decreasing HA use persistence. This is all despite the fact that deriving relevant audiological care-process variables from the available records was not straightforward, especially concerning the definition of the date of HA fitting, and the use of battery ordering data to determine long-term HA use persistence.
We have shown that utilizing EHRs in audiology has the potential to provide novel insights into clinical practice patterns, audiologic outcomes, and relations between factors pertaining to hearing and to other health conditions in clinical populations, despite the potential pitfalls regarding the lack of control over the variables available and limitations on how the data are entered. We thus conclude that research using EHRs has the potential to be an integral supplement to population-based and epidemiologic research in the field of audiology.
本文总结了美国大量使用助听器的退伍军人的听力、一般健康状况和助听器(HA)结果数据。目前的文章还为一系列论文提供了基础,这些论文将探讨广泛的因素与 HA 结果之间的关系。
患者样本为 2012 年 4 月至 2014 年 10 月期间通过美国退伍军人事务部远程订单输入系统订购助听器的所有(n=731213)患者。对于这些患者,退伍军人事务部电子健康记录(EHR)存储在各种数据库中,提供了人口统计学数据、接受的诊断和程序代码(2007 年至 2017 年)、听力测试、佩戴后 6 个月内的自我报告结果以及助听器电池订单(至 2017 年)。进行了数据清理和准备,并参考了对其他研究类似研究有潜在价值的见解进行了讨论。随着时间的推移,助听器电池订单数据用于得出长期使用助听器的持久性衡量标准。使用描述性统计数据来描述样本,与其他数据的比较分析支持基本有效性评估,单变量分析探测佩戴后 2 年患者特征与助听器使用持久性之间的新关联。
经过广泛的清理和数据准备,数据显示出在各种指标上具有合理的特征,并基于与其他已发表数据的比较,显示出足够的有效性。此外,与其他主要慢性疾病的治疗持久性数据相比,助听器使用持久性的比率令人满意。数据还表明,某些合并症(帕金森病、糖尿病、关节炎和视力障碍)的存在与助听器使用持久性显著降低相关,住院次数增加(尤其是新助听器使用者)也与助听器使用持久性降低相关,而一般来说,合并症的严重程度越高,助听器使用持久性越低。尽管从现有记录中得出相关的听力学护理过程变量并不简单,尤其是关于助听器适配日期的定义,以及使用电池订购数据来确定长期助听器使用持久性,但这一切都是如此。
我们已经表明,尽管在可用变量的控制和数据输入方式方面存在潜在缺陷,但利用电子健康记录在听力学中具有提供临床实践模式、听力学结果以及听力和其他健康状况相关因素之间关系的新见解的潜力。我们因此得出结论,使用电子健康记录进行研究有可能成为听力学领域人群为基础和流行病学研究的重要补充。