• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录与肿瘤登记文档中癌症患者吸烟状况的一致性。

Concordance Between Electronic Health Record and Tumor Registry Documentation of Smoking Status Among Patients With Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Division of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL.

出版信息

JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:518-526. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00187.

DOI:10.1200/CCI.20.00187
PMID:33974447
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with cancer who use tobacco experience reduced treatment effectiveness, increased risk of recurrence and mortality, and diminished quality of life. Accurate tobacco use documentation for patients with cancer is necessary for appropriate clinical decision making and cancer outcomes research. Our aim was to assess agreement between electronic health record (EHR) smoking status data and cancer registry data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all patients with cancer seen at University of Florida Health from 2015 to 2018. Structured EHR smoking status was compared with the tumor registry smoking status for each patient. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, and Kappa statistics were calculated. We used logistic regression to determine if patient characteristics were associated with odds of agreement in smoking status between EHR and registry data.

RESULTS

We analyzed 11,110 patient records. EHR smoking status was documented for nearly all (98%) patients. Overall kappa (0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.79) indicated moderate agreement between the registry and EHR. The sensitivity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.84), and the specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.97). The logistic regression results indicated that agreement was more likely among patients who were older and female and if the EHR documentation occurred closer to the date of cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Although documentation of smoking status for patients with cancer is standard practice, we only found moderate agreement between EHR and tumor registry data. Interventions and research using EHR data should prioritize ensuring the validity of smoking status data. Multilevel strategies are needed to achieve consistent and accurate documentation of smoking status in cancer care.

摘要

目的

患有癌症并使用烟草的患者会降低治疗效果,增加复发和死亡风险,并降低生活质量。准确记录癌症患者的烟草使用情况对于适当的临床决策和癌症结局研究是必要的。我们的目的是评估电子健康记录(EHR)吸烟状况数据与癌症登记数据之间的一致性。

材料和方法

我们确定了 2015 年至 2018 年期间在佛罗里达大学健康中心就诊的所有癌症患者。比较了每位患者的 EHR 吸烟状况与肿瘤登记处的吸烟状况。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和 Kappa 统计量。我们使用逻辑回归来确定患者特征是否与 EHR 和注册表数据中吸烟状况的一致性有关。

结果

我们分析了 11110 份患者记录。几乎所有(98%)患者的 EHR 吸烟状况都有记录。总体 Kappa(0.78;95%CI,0.77 至 0.79)表明登记处和 EHR 之间存在中度一致性。敏感性为 0.82(95%CI,0.81 至 0.84),特异性为 0.97(95%CI,0.96 至 0.97)。逻辑回归结果表明,年龄较大、女性以及 EHR 记录更接近癌症诊断日期的患者更有可能达成一致。

结论

尽管记录癌症患者的吸烟状况是标准做法,但我们仅发现 EHR 和肿瘤登记数据之间存在中度一致性。使用 EHR 数据的干预和研究应优先确保吸烟状况数据的有效性。需要采取多层次策略,以实现癌症护理中吸烟状况的一致和准确记录。

相似文献

1
Concordance Between Electronic Health Record and Tumor Registry Documentation of Smoking Status Among Patients With Cancer.电子健康记录与肿瘤登记文档中癌症患者吸烟状况的一致性。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 May;5:518-526. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00187.
2
Utility of Using Cancer Registry Data to Identify Patients for Tobacco Treatment Trials.利用癌症登记数据识别烟草治疗试验患者的效用。
J Registry Manag. 2019 Summer;46(2):30-36.
3
Rapid Development of Specialty Population Registries and Quality Measures from Electronic Health Record Data*. An Agile Framework.利用电子健康记录数据快速开发专科人群登记册和质量指标*。一个敏捷框架。
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Jun 14;56(99):e74-e83. doi: 10.3414/ME16-02-0031.
4
Tobacco-Related Counseling and Documentation in Adolescent Primary Care Practice: Challenges and Opportunities.青少年初级保健实践中的烟草相关咨询和记录:挑战和机遇。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):1023-1029. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz076.
5
Validity of Veterans Health Administration structured data to determine accurate smoking status.退伍军人健康管理局结构化数据确定准确吸烟状况的有效性。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):1507-1515. doi: 10.1177/1460458219882259. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Assessing Cancer History Accuracy in Primary Care Electronic Health Records Through Cancer Registry Linkage.通过癌症登记处链接评估初级保健电子健康记录中的癌症史准确性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jul 1;113(7):924-932. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa210.
7
Use of electronic health records to support smoking cessation.使用电子健康记录来支持戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD008743. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008743.pub2.
8
Validation of diagnosis codes to identify side of colon in an electronic health record registry.验证诊断代码以在电子健康记录注册表中识别结肠侧。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0824-7.
9
Absent and Discordant Electronic Health Record Documentation of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Care.癌症护理中补充和替代医学的电子健康记录文档缺失与不一致
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(9-10):988-995. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0141.
10
Population-Based Registry Linkages to Improve Validity of Electronic Health Record-Based Cancer Research.基于人群的注册链接,以提高电子健康记录为基础的癌症研究的有效性。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Apr;29(4):796-806. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0882. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoking data quality of primary care practices in comparison with smoking data from the New Zealand Māori and Pacific abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme: an observational study.初级保健实践中的吸烟数据质量与新西兰毛利人和太平洋地区腹主动脉瘤筛查计划中的吸烟数据的比较:一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 5;24(1):1513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19021-8.
2
The validity of electronic health data for measuring smoking status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.电子健康数据测量吸烟状况的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 2;24(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02416-3.
3
Reliability of Data Collected via Ecological Momentary Assessment on the Example of FeverApp Registry.
以FeverApp注册库为例,通过生态瞬时评估收集的数据的可靠性。
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;10(2):385. doi: 10.3390/children10020385.
4
The Utility of Oncology Information Systems for Prognostic Modelling in Head and Neck Cancer.肿瘤信息系统在头颈部癌症预后建模中的应用。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 14;47(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01907-6.
5
Characteristics differ based on usual cigar-type use among U.S. adults: Analysis from the tobacco use supplement to the current population survey.美国成年人中,根据常用雪茄类型的不同,特征也有所差异:来自当前人口调查烟草使用补充资料的分析。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Sep 15;24:101560. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101560. eCollection 2021 Dec.