Stan Daniela L, Wahner-Roedler Dietlind L, Yost Kathleen J, O'Byrne Thomas Jamie, Branda Megan E, Leppin Aaron L, Tilburt Jon C
1 Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
2 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(9-10):988-995. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0141.
Many patients with cancer use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), but the quality of CAM documentation in their electronic health records (EHRs) is unknown. The authors aimed to describe (i) the prevalence and types of CAM used after cancer diagnosis and the influence of oncologists on CAM use, as per patients' self-report, and (ii) the prevalence of CAM documentation in the EHR and its consistency with self-reported usage.
Patient and provider surveys and chart review.
SETTINGS/LOCATION: Medical oncology practices at one institution.
Patients with cancer at oncologist visits.
Patient self-reported rate of 3-month postvisit CAM use; provider EHR documentation of CAM use or discussion and its concordance with patient self-report.
Among 327 patients enrolled, 248 responded to the 3-month postvisit survey. Of these, 158 reported CAM use after diagnosis (63.7%). CAM users were younger (p < 0.001) and had a higher percentage of women (p = 0.03) than nonusers. Modalities most commonly used were supplements (62.6%), special diets (38.6%), chiropractor (28.4%), and massage (28.4%). CAM was used to improve well-being (68.7%), manage adverse effects (35.5%), and fight cancer (22.9%). Oncologists suggested CAM in 22.5% of instances of use. CAM use/discussion was documented for 58.2% of self-reported CAM users. Of the documented modalities, EHR and self-report were concordant for only 8.2%. CAM documentation was associated with physician provider (p = 0.03), older patients (p = 0.01), and treatment with radiation (p = 0.03) or surgery (p = 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, patients with breast cancer or "other" tumor category were four times more likely than patients with gastrointestinal cancer to have CAM use documentation (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 4.41 [1.48-13.10]; 3.76 [1.42-9.99], respectively).
Most patients with cancer use CAM after diagnosis, yet EHR documentation is complete for very few. Oncologists should inquire about, document, and discuss CAM benefits and harm or refer patients to CAM specialists.
许多癌症患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM),但其电子健康记录(EHR)中CAM记录的质量尚不清楚。作者旨在描述:(i)根据患者的自我报告,癌症诊断后使用CAM的患病率和类型以及肿瘤学家对CAM使用的影响;(ii)EHR中CAM记录的患病率及其与自我报告使用情况的一致性。
患者和提供者调查以及病历审查。
设置/地点:一家机构的肿瘤内科诊所。
肿瘤学家门诊的癌症患者。
患者自我报告的就诊后3个月使用CAM的比率;提供者在EHR中记录的CAM使用或讨论情况及其与患者自我报告的一致性。
在纳入的327例患者中,248例对就诊后3个月的调查做出了回应。其中,158例报告在诊断后使用了CAM(63.7%)。与未使用者相比,CAM使用者更年轻(p<0.001),女性比例更高(p=0.03)。最常用的方式是补充剂(62.6%)、特殊饮食(38.6%)、脊椎按摩治疗(28.4%)和按摩(28.4%)。使用CAM是为了改善健康状况(68.7%)、管理不良反应(35.5%)和对抗癌症(22.9%)。在22.5%的使用情况中,肿瘤学家建议使用CAM。在自我报告使用CAM的患者中,有58.2%的患者记录了CAM的使用/讨论情况。在记录的方式中,EHR与自我报告的一致性仅为8.2%。CAM记录与医生提供者(p=0.03)、老年患者(p=0.01)以及接受放疗(p=0.03)或手术(p=0.001)治疗有关。在调整其他因素后,乳腺癌患者或“其他”肿瘤类型的患者有CAM使用记录的可能性是胃肠道癌症患者的四倍(优势比[95%置信区间]:分别为4.41[1.48-13.10];3.76[1.42-9.99])。
大多数癌症患者在诊断后使用CAM,但EHR记录却很少是完整记录。肿瘤学家应该询问、记录并讨论CAM带来的益处和危害,或者将患者转介给CAM专家。