Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy.
Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Jan;38(1):113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.04.022. Epub 2021 May 8.
The placebo effect is a well described phenomenon in blinded studies evaluating antianginal therapeutics, although its effect on clinical research metrics remains unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the effect of placebo on end points of symptoms, life quality, and functional outcomes in randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of symptomatic stable coronary artery disease.
We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database for double-blind RCTs of antiangina therapeutics. Patients randomized to the placebo arm were the study population. Main outcomes were the changes in exercise performance (exercise treadmill test [ETT] parameters), quality of life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire domains), symptoms (Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class) and drug usage (nitroglycerin tablets per week) between baseline and after placebo treatment. The primary outcome was ETT total duration time. Data were pooled with a random effect model.
Seventy-eight RCTs (83% drug-controlled, 17% procedure-controlled) were included encompassing 4925 patients randomized to placebo. ETT total duration time was significantly improved after placebo treatment compared with baseline (mean, 29.2; 95% confidence interval, 20.6-37.8] seconds) with evidence of high heterogeneity (I = 98%) At subgroup analysis, crossover design was associated with a smaller placebo effect on ETT performance than parallel study design (P for interaction = 0.001). A significant placebo effect was observed for all secondary outcomes with overall high heterogeneity.
A substantial placebo effect was present in angina RCTs across a variety of functional and life quality metrics. High variability in placebo effect size was present, mostly unexplained by differences in study and patient characteristics.
安慰剂效应在评估抗心绞痛治疗的盲法研究中是一种被充分描述的现象,尽管其对临床研究指标的影响尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以量化安慰剂对症状、生活质量和有症状的稳定型冠状动脉疾病随机安慰剂对照试验(RCT)中功能结局终点的影响。
我们系统地检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库中的双盲 RCT 抗心绞痛治疗。随机分配到安慰剂组的患者为研究人群。主要结局是运动表现(运动平板试验[ETT]参数)、生活质量(西雅图心绞痛问卷领域)、症状(加拿大心血管学会心绞痛分级)和药物使用(每周硝酸甘油片)在基线和安慰剂治疗后的变化。主要结局是 ETT 总持续时间。数据采用随机效应模型进行汇总。
共纳入 78 项 RCT(83%药物对照,17%程序对照),共纳入 4925 例随机分配至安慰剂组的患者。与基线相比,ETT 总持续时间在安慰剂治疗后显著改善(平均,29.2;95%置信区间,20.6-37.8]秒),且存在高度异质性(I=98%)。在亚组分析中,交叉设计与平行研究设计相比,对 ETT 表现的安慰剂效应较小(交互检验 P=0.001)。所有次要结局均观察到显著的安慰剂效应,总体异质性较大。
在各种功能和生活质量指标的心绞痛 RCT 中,存在显著的安慰剂效应。安慰剂效应大小的变异性很大,大部分无法用研究和患者特征的差异来解释。