Carrara Elena, Savoldi Alessia, Piddock Laura J V, Franceschi Francois, Ellis Sally, Sharland Mike, Brink Adrian John, Harris Patrick N A, Levy-Hara Gabriel, Rohit Anusha, Tsioutis Constantinos, Zayyad Hiba, Giske Christian, Chiamenti Margherita, Bragantini Damiano, Righi Elda, Gorska Anna, Tacconelli Evelina
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jan;28(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 May 8.
Optimal treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) infections is uncertain because of the lack of good-quality evidence and the limited effectiveness of available antibiotics. The aim of this survey was to investigate clinicians' prescribing strategies for treating CR-GNB infections worldwide.
A 36-item questionnaire was developed addressing the following aspects of antibiotic prescribing: respondent's background, diagnostic and therapeutic availability, preferred antibiotic strategies and rationale for selecting combination therapy. Prescribers were recruited following the snowball sampling approach, and a post-stratification correction with inverse proportional weights was used to adjust the sample's representativeness.
A total of 1012 respondents from 95 countries participated in the survey. Overall, 298 (30%) of the respondents had local guidelines for treating CR-GNB at their facility and 702 (71%) had access to Infectious Diseases consultation, with significant discrepancies according to country economic status: 85% (390/502) in high-income countries versus 59% (194/283) in upper-medium-income countries and 30% (118/196) in lower-middle-income countries/lower-income-countries). Targeted regimens varied widely, ranging from 40 regimens for CR-Acinetobacter spp. to more than 100 regimens for CR-Enterobacteriaceae. Although the majority of respondents acknowledged the lack of evidence behind this choice, dual combination was the preferred treatment scheme and carbapenem-polymyxin was the most prescribed regimen, irrespective of pathogen and infection source. Respondents noticeably disagreed around the meaning of 'combination therapy' with 20% (150/783) indicating the simple addition of multiple compounds, 42% (321/783) requiring the presence of in vitro activity and 38% (290/783) requiring in vitro synergism.
Management of CR-GNB infections is far from being standardized. Strategic public health focused randomized controlled trials are urgently required to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.
由于缺乏高质量证据以及现有抗生素疗效有限,耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌(CR-GNB)感染的最佳治疗方案尚不确定。本次调查旨在研究全球临床医生治疗CR-GNB感染的处方策略。
设计了一份包含36个条目的问卷,涉及抗生素处方的以下方面:受访者背景、诊断和治疗的可及性、首选抗生素策略以及选择联合治疗的理由。采用滚雪球抽样方法招募开处方者,并使用逆比例权重的事后分层校正来调整样本的代表性。
来自95个国家的1012名受访者参与了此次调查。总体而言,298名(30%)受访者所在机构有治疗CR-GNB的当地指南,702名(71%)能够获得感染病会诊服务,根据国家经济状况存在显著差异:高收入国家为85%(390/502),中高收入国家为59%(194/283),中低收入国家/低收入国家为30%(118/196)。针对性治疗方案差异很大,从针对CR-不动杆菌属的40种方案到针对CR-肠杆菌科的100多种方案不等。尽管大多数受访者承认这一选择背后缺乏证据,但双联组合是首选治疗方案,碳青霉烯类-多粘菌素是最常用的治疗方案,无论病原体和感染源如何。受访者对“联合治疗”的含义明显存在分歧,20%(150/783)表示简单添加多种化合物,42%(321/783)要求具有体外活性,38%(290/783)要求具有体外协同作用。
CR-GNB感染的管理远未标准化。迫切需要开展以公共卫生战略为重点的随机对照试验,为循证治疗指南提供依据。