Suppr超能文献

查尔斯·拜恩,人体抢夺者的最后一位受害者:埋葬的法律依据。

Charles Byrne, Last Victim of the Bodysnatchers: the Legal Case for Burial.

机构信息

Dickson Poon School of Law, Centre of Medical Law & Ethics, King's College, London WC2R 2LS, UK.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2021 Aug 11;29(2):252-283. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwab008.

Abstract

The retention and display of the remains of Charles Byrne, an Irishman with acromegaly, by the Hunterian Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons has been contentious for some years, and the moral case for his release for burial has been repeatedly made. This article makes the legal case through five arguments. The first three concern common law rights and duties; Byrne's right to burial, the duty of the State to ensure his burial where others do not, and the right of his friends to assume that duty. The fourth concerns Byrne's common law right to direct his disposal, and, related to this, not to be retained and displayed. The fifth, which underpins the rest, is that Byrne is not, and has never been property, and it is in fact intuitively and legally arguable that he, like other corpses, remains a person. The article finally outlines three options available to those wishing to ensure Byrne finally has the burial at sea that he sought to ensure in 1783.

摘要

多年来,皇家外科学院亨特博物馆保留并展示爱尔兰巨人症患者查尔斯·伯恩的遗体一直存在争议,人们多次提出释放遗体进行埋葬的道德理由。本文通过五个论点提出了法律论据。前三个论点涉及普通法权利和义务:伯恩的埋葬权、国家确保他人埋葬的义务,以及他的朋友承担该义务的权利。第四个论点涉及伯恩对自己处置方式的普通法权利,以及与之相关的,他不应被保留和展示。第五个论点是伯恩不是财产,而且从直觉和法律上可以争辩说,他和其他尸体一样仍然是一个人。本文最后概述了希望确保伯恩最终按照他在 1783 年所希望的那样进行海葬的人可采取的三个选择。

相似文献

2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
The study of anatomy in England from 1700 to the early 20th century.1700 年至 20 世纪初英国的解剖学研究。
J Anat. 2011 Aug;219(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01381.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验