Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Social and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jan;18(1):2184-2192. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 2.
Mixed method approaches are increasingly being used in social pharmacy research due to its potential to uncover insights that are not possible with separate quantitative and qualitative studies. Despite their increasing use, there are some limitations in these publications. Typically, specific mixed method designs are not chosen, quantitative and qualitative data are not systematically integrated, and the credibility or validity of the approach is not addressed. In this paper, we discuss mixed method designs and their applications in social pharmacy. Different integration techniques and legitimation types are detailed. We describe new methodological developments and provide examples from recent mixed method studies in social pharmacy. Finally, we also provide recommendations for planning, conducting, reporting, and evaluating mixed method studies. We suggest that researchers interested in conducting mixed method studies follow recommended guidelines and obtain training in mixed methods to ensure that rigorous mixed method studies are conducted in social and administrative pharmacy.
由于混合方法能够揭示仅通过单独的定量和定性研究无法获得的见解,因此在社会药学研究中越来越多地使用混合方法。尽管它们的使用越来越多,但这些出版物仍然存在一些局限性。通常,不会选择特定的混合方法设计,也不会系统地整合定量和定性数据,也不会解决方法的可信度或有效性。在本文中,我们讨论了混合方法设计及其在社会药学中的应用。详细说明了不同的整合技术和合法化类型。我们描述了新的方法学发展,并提供了来自社会药学中最近的混合方法研究的示例。最后,我们还为混合方法研究的规划、进行、报告和评估提供了建议。我们建议有兴趣进行混合方法研究的研究人员遵循建议的指南,并接受混合方法方面的培训,以确保在社会和行政药学中进行严格的混合方法研究。