混合方法学在临床药学研究中的应用。

Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research.

作者信息

Hadi Muhammad Abdul, Closs S José

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm-Al-Qura University, Al-Abdia, Mecca, 13578, Saudi Arabia.

School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9UT, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):635-40. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0231-z.

Abstract

Introduction Mixed-methods methodology, as the name suggests refers to mixing of elements of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies in a single study. In the past decade, mixed-methods methodology has gained popularity among healthcare researchers as it promises to bring together the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Methodology A number of mixed-methods designs are available in the literature and the four most commonly used designs in healthcare research are: the convergent parallel design, the embedded design, the exploratory design, and the explanatory design. Each has its own unique advantages, challenges and procedures and selection of a particular design should be guided by the research question. Guidance on designing, conducting and reporting mixed-methods research is available in the literature, so it is advisable to adhere to this to ensure methodological rigour. When to use it is best suited when the research questions require: triangulating findings from different methodologies to explain a single phenomenon; clarifying the results of one method using another method; informing the design of one method based on the findings of another method, development of a scale/questionnaire and answering different research questions within a single study. Two case studies have been presented to illustrate possible applications of mixed-methods methodology. Limitations Possessing the necessary knowledge and skills to undertake qualitative and quantitative data collection, analysis, interpretation and integration remains the biggest challenge for researchers conducting mixed-methods studies. Sequential study designs are often time consuming, being in two (or more) phases whereas concurrent study designs may require more than one data collector to collect both qualitative and quantitative data at the same time.

摘要

引言 混合方法方法论,顾名思义,是指在一项研究中融合定性和定量方法论的要素。在过去十年中,混合方法方法论在医疗保健研究人员中越来越受欢迎,因为它有望结合定性和定量方法的优势。

方法论 文献中提供了多种混合方法设计,医疗保健研究中最常用的四种设计是:收敛平行设计、嵌入式设计、探索性设计和解释性设计。每种设计都有其独特的优点、挑战和程序,特定设计的选择应以研究问题为指导。文献中提供了关于设计、进行和报告混合方法研究的指导,因此建议遵循此指导以确保方法的严谨性。

何时使用 当研究问题需要:对来自不同方法论的结果进行三角互证以解释单一现象;用另一种方法澄清一种方法的结果;根据另一种方法的结果为一种方法的设计提供信息、开发量表/问卷以及在一项研究中回答不同的研究问题时,它最为适用。本文给出了两个案例研究以说明混合方法方法论的可能应用。

局限性 对于进行混合方法研究的研究人员来说,具备进行定性和定量数据收集、分析、解释和整合所需的知识和技能仍然是最大的挑战。序列研究设计通常很耗时,分为两个(或更多)阶段,而并行研究设计可能需要不止一个数据收集者同时收集定性和定量数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索