Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Heart. 2022 Mar;108(5):345-352. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318753. Epub 2021 May 11.
To assess the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding associated with the use of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in a real-world population.
We identified all anticoagulant-naive initiators of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban for the indication AF in Norway between January 2013 and December 2017. Multivariate competing risk regression was used to calculate subhazard ratios (SHRs) describing associations between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) compared with warfarin for risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding.
Among 30 401 patients ≥75 years identified (median age 82 years, 53% women, mean CHADS-VaSc score 4.5), 3857 initiated dabigatran, 6108 rivaroxaban, 13 786 apixaban and 6650 warfarin. Reduced dose was initiated in 11 559 (49%) of the NOAC-treated patients. For stroke, the SHRs for standard dose NOAC against warfarin were 0.80 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.13) for dabigatran; 1.07 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.30) for rivaroxaban and 0.95 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.15) for apixaban. For major bleeding, the SHRs against warfarin were 0.75 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.08) for dabigatran; 0.96 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.16) for rivaroxaban and 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.91) for apixaban. Comparing reduced doses of NOACs with warfarin yielded similar results. Sensitivity analyses were in accordance with the main results.
In this nationwide cohort study of patients ≥75 years initiating oral anticoagulation for AF, standard and reduced dose NOACs were associated with similar risks of stroke/SE as warfarin and lower or similar risks of bleeding. The NOACs seem to be a safe option also in elderly patients.
在真实人群中评估老年房颤(AF)患者使用口服抗凝剂相关的卒中/全身性栓塞(SE)和大出血风险。
我们在 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间,确定了挪威所有新接受华法林、达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班用于 AF 适应证的抗凝药物初治患者。采用多变量竞争风险回归计算非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)与华法林相比的亚危险比(SHR),以描述卒中/SE 和大出血风险之间的关联。
在 30401 名≥75 岁患者中(中位年龄 82 岁,53%为女性,平均 CHADS-VaSc 评分 4.5),3857 名患者开始使用达比加群,6108 名患者开始使用利伐沙班,13786 名患者开始使用阿哌沙班,6650 名患者开始使用华法林。NOAC 治疗患者中有 11559 名(49%)接受了低剂量治疗。对于卒中,标准剂量 NOAC 与华法林相比,达比加群的 SHR 为 0.80(95%CI 0.57 至 1.13);利伐沙班为 1.07(95%CI 0.89 至 1.30);阿哌沙班为 0.95(95%CI 0.78 至 1.15)。对于大出血,与华法林相比,达比加群的 SHR 为 0.75(95%CI 0.52 至 1.08);利伐沙班为 0.96(95%CI 0.78 至 1.16);阿哌沙班为 0.74(95%CI 0.60 至 0.91)。比较 NOACs 的低剂量与华法林的结果相似。敏感性分析与主要结果一致。
在这项新诊断为 AF 的≥75 岁患者接受口服抗凝治疗的全国性队列研究中,标准剂量和低剂量 NOACs 与华法林相关的卒中/SE 风险相似,出血风险较低或相似。NOACs 似乎也是老年患者的安全选择。