Luojus Alex, Lehto Mika, Halminen Olli, Lehtonen Ossi, Niemi Mikko, Teppo Konsta, Kuoppala Jaana, Haukka Jari, Putaala Jukka, Linna Miika, Mustonen Pirjo, Aro Aapo, Hartikainen Juha, Lip Gregory Yoke Hong, Airaksinen Kari Eino Juhani
Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Internal Medicine, Jorvi Hospital, Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District, Espoo, Finland.
Eur Heart J Open. 2025 Apr 23;5(3):oeaf046. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf046. eCollection 2025 May.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at reduced dosage regimens are the first choice of ischaemic stroke (IS) prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and elevated bleeding risk or renal insufficiency. We compared the outcomes of reduced dose DOACs and warfarin.
We included all new-onset patients with AF in Finland from 2011 to 2018. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for IS, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), bleeding, and mortality were calculated for dabigatran ( = 2 672), rivaroxaban ( = 1 866), apixaban ( = 3 936), and warfarin ( = 43 548). Patients on warfarin were grouped into quartiles by their individual time-in-therapeutic range (TTR), with the second best TTR quartile as a reference group for comparisons. Risk of IS was highest in the low TTR quartiles of warfarin, lowest in the best TTR quartile (0.65 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.83), and did not differ for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with the second best TTR quartile. Risk of ICH was highest in low TTR quartiles of warfarin (HRs 7.20, 5.48-9.46 and 1.91, 1.44-2.55), and was not different in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Risk of all-cause death and bleeding were lowest in the two best TTR quartiles, and highest in the poorest TTR group. Mortality was higher for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, compared with the second best TTR quartile of warfarin.
DOACs with reduced doses are efficient and safe stroke prevention therapy in high-risk patients with AF when compared with warfarin therapy of sufficient TTR. In this comparison, warfarin therapy of excellent TTR-quality was associated with the lowest risk of bleeding and mortality.
对于心房颤动(AF)且出血风险升高或肾功能不全的患者,采用降低剂量方案的直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)是缺血性卒中(IS)预防的首选。我们比较了降低剂量的DOACs与华法林的疗效。
我们纳入了2011年至2018年芬兰所有新诊断的AF患者。计算了达比加群(n = 2672)、利伐沙班(n = 1866)、阿哌沙班(n = 3936)和华法林(n = 43548)发生IS、颅内出血(ICH)、出血和死亡的校正风险比(HRs)。服用华法林的患者按其个体治疗范围内时间(TTR)分为四分位数组,将第二好的TTR四分位数组作为比较的参照组。华法林低TTR四分位数组发生IS的风险最高,最佳TTR四分位数组最低(0.65,95%置信区间,0.51 - 0.83),与第二好的TTR四分位数组相比,达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班发生IS的风险无差异。华法林低TTR四分位数组发生ICH的风险最高(HRs分别为7.20,5.48 - 9.46和1.91,1.44 - 2.55),达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班使用者发生ICH的风险无差异。全因死亡和出血风险在两个最佳TTR四分位数组中最低,在最差TTR组中最高。与华法林第二好的TTR四分位数组相比,达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班的死亡率更高。
与具有足够TTR的华法林治疗相比,降低剂量的DOACs是AF高危患者有效且安全的卒中预防治疗方法。在本比较中,具有优异TTR质量的华法林治疗与最低的出血和死亡风险相关。