Suppr超能文献

12至15岁学龄儿童中传统Clinpro 3M ESPE与亲水性Ultraseal XT Hydro的固位力、防龋效果及变色情况的比较与评估:一项为期6个月的单盲随机临床试验

Comparison and Evaluation of the Retention, Cariostatic Effect, and Discoloration of Conventional Clinpro 3M ESPE and Hydrophilic Ultraseal XT Hydro among 12-15-year-old Schoolchildren for a Period of 6 Months: A Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Mohapatra Subhashree, Prabakar Jayashri, Indiran Meignana Arumugham, Kumar R Pradeep, Sakthi D Sri

机构信息

Department of Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;13(6):688-693. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1859.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pit and fissures are more prone to caries as compared to smooth surfaces. Sealing the pit and fissures with sealants is considered to be highly effective in the prevention of pit and fissure caries. Hydrophobic sealants are technique sensitive in nature. Ultraseal XT Hydro sealant is moisture tolerant which incorporates the benefits of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic sealants into one unique chemistry. Hence, the study was conducted to compare and evaluate the retention, cariostatic effect, and discoloration of conventional Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™ and hydrophilic Ultraseal XT Hydro sealants among 12-15-year-old schoolchildren for 6 months.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a single-blinded, randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Schoolchildren aged 12-15 years were recruited in this clinical trial. Clinpro sealant and Ultraseal XT Hydro were placed in the right and left quadrant molars, respectively, and were assigned as group I and II. The sample size arrived was 60 teeth per group and at 30 patients based on the computer-generated random sequence. Sealant coverage between the two sealants was compared using Mann-Whitney test and test for proportions.

RESULTS

After 6 months, it was seen that 10 teeth out of 44 (22.72%) with Clinpro had the sealant covering all the fissures compared to Ultraseal XT Hydro which was only 9%. Fifty-nine percent of retention rate was seen with Clinpro compared to Ultraseal XT Hydro sealant (27.27%). Caries incidence was higher in the case of group II. No difference was observed with regard to the discoloration of the sealants.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that for a longer follow-up period conventional Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™ was better than Ultra XT Hydro seal in terms of retention and cariostatic effect.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Mohapatra S, Prabakar J, Indiran MA, Comparison and Evaluation of the Retention, Cariostatic Effect, and Discoloration of Conventional Clinpro 3M ESPE and Hydrophilic Ultraseal XT Hydro among 12-15-year-old Schoolchildren for a Period of 6 Months: A Single-blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(6):688-693.

摘要

引言

与光滑表面相比,窝沟更容易发生龋齿。用窝沟封闭剂封闭窝沟被认为对预防窝沟龋非常有效。疏水性封闭剂在本质上对技术要求较高。超密封XT Hydro封闭剂具有耐湿性,它将亲水性和疏水性封闭剂两者优点融入到一种独特的化学配方中。因此,开展这项研究以比较和评估12至15岁学龄儿童中传统的Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™封闭剂和亲水性超密封XT Hydro封闭剂在6个月内封闭剂的保留率、防龋效果及变色情况。

材料与方法

这是一项单盲、随机分组的半口临床试验。12至15岁的学龄儿童被纳入该临床试验。Clinpro封闭剂和超密封XT Hydro封闭剂分别放置于右侧和左侧象限磨牙,并分别指定为I组和II组。根据计算机生成随机序列,每组样本量为60颗牙,涉及30名患者。使用曼-惠特尼检验及比例检验比较两种封闭剂的封闭剂覆盖情况。

结果

6个月之后,发现Clinpro组4颗牙中有10颗(22.72%)封闭剂覆盖了所有窝沟相比之下,超密封XT Hydro组只有9颗牙达到此效果。Clinpro封闭剂保留率为百分之五十九,相比之下超密封XT Hydro封闭剂保留率为2七十二百分之。II组的龋齿发病率更高。在封闭剂变色方面未观察到差异。

结论

得出结论,在更长的随访期内,传统的Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™封闭剂在保留率和防龋效果方面优于超密封XT Hydro封闭剂。

如何引用本文

莫哈帕特拉S、普拉巴卡尔J、英迪兰MA,12至15岁学龄儿童6个月期间传统Clinpro 3M ESPE和亲水性超密封XT Hydro封闭剂的保留率、防龋效果及变色情况的比较与评估:一项单盲随机临床试验。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2020;13(6):688-693。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验